Evaluation of the impact of inbreeding coefficient on milk production, lactation length and first calving age of Iranian dairy cows using Quantile regression

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

Abstract

Introduction: Inbreeding, which has been defined as the mating between relative animals, leads to increase homozygous genotypes and decrease heterozygous genotypes in a population. As a result, the progenies of such mating are inbred (Wakchaure and Genguly 2015). Reduction of the traits associated with physiological efficiency and reproductive potential are the most important impacts of inbreeding in the farm animals (Filho et al. 2015, Fleming et al. 2018). Traits in livestock have different heritabilities suggesting that they are not influenced by inbreeding in a similar pattern and that although animals’ fitness is generally deteriorated; the magnitude of inbreeding depends on the type of the trait (Roff 1998; Derose and Roff, 1999, Wright et al. 2008, Mikkelsen et al. 2010). Until now, all studies regarding effects of inbreeding on productive and reproductive traits of dairy cows have been focused on using the statistical models in which inbreeding coefficient was included as covariable (Behmaram et al. 2017) or as the classified variable (Amirzadeh 2012). As inbreeding coefficient is defined as a covariable in the model, only a regression coefficient is estimated describing average changes of the trait per increasing / decreasing inbreeding coefficient. As a matter of fact, inbreeding may unequally influence the shape of distribution of the trait. Based on this assumption, this research aimed to estimate inbreeding effects on some productive and reproductive traits of Iranian dairy cows using Quantile regression statistical method.     
Material and methods: The data set was provided by Animal Breeding Centre, Iran. Foxpro (version 2.6) and UEStudio (version 09) software were utilized for editing initial data. Final data consisted of 580,802 records belonging to 580,802 first-parity cows distributed in 1,185 herds (over 20 provinces of the country) and calved between years 1991 and 2015. The traits under consideration were lactation milk yield (TMILK), 305d, 2X milk yield (MILK3052X), average daily milk yield (ADM), lactation length (LL), and age at the first calving (AFC). The average of the traits in the final data set was 9,447 Kg, 7,792 Kg, 30 Kg, 315 d and 25.6 m, respectively. Holstein gene percentage (HGP) of the cows in the pedigree file was set to be in the range of 50 to 100 and AFC of the cows was set to be between 18 and 48 months. Inbreeding coefficient (IC) of individual animals was calculated by CFC software (Sargolzaei et al. 2006). Fitting a series of the Quantile regression models was conducted with the use of SAS (version 9.4) software. Quantile regression, which was introduced by Koenker and Bassett (1978), extends the regression model to conditional quantiles of the response variable, such as the 90th percentile. Quantile regression is particularly useful when the rate of change in the conditional Quantile, expressed by the regression coefficients, depends on the Quantile (Chen 2005). In all the models used in this research, fixed effects of province, year and month of calving, as well as linear co-variables of HGP, IC and AFC (except of the model for AFC as the trait) were included. For TMILK, lactation length was also included as linear co-variable. Moreover, in addition to the quantile models and for the sake of estimating usual regression coefficient, general linear model (GLM) was also fitted for each trait in which a single regression coefficient of the trait on IC was defined. Ordinary least-squares regression can be used to estimate conditional percentiles by making a distributional assumption such as normality for the error term in the model. The main advantage of Quantile regression over ordinary least-squares regression is its flexibility for modeling data with heterogeneous conditional distributions (Chen 2005).      
Results and discussion: Based upon the analysis of main pedigree file, the total number of animals was 1,941,871 (16,169 sires and 895,376 dams) among which the number of base and non-base animals were 246,388 (3,936 sires and 120,287 dams) and 1,695483 (12,233 sires and 775,089 dams), respectively.Total number of inbred animals in the pedigree was 1,211,343. Average IC for total as well as inbred animals was found to be 0.9149% (minimum 0% and maximum 47.02%) and 1.4651% (minimum 0.00038% and maximum 47.02%), respectively. For the cows with records for all five traits, IC ranged from 0 to 38.45% with the average of 1.13% (SD=1.63%). Estimate of annual change of IC was found to be 0.017 (SE=0.005), which was statistically significant (p < 0.01) indicating that there is a positive increase of inbreeding in Iranian dairy cows’ population over the time. Within each trait, different Quantiles were unequally influenced as animal’s IC increased. Vast majority of the estimated regression coefficients in different Quantiles were statistically significant (p < 0.05). Based upon fitting Quantile regression model and the average estimated regression coefficients, it was found that TMILK, MILK3052X, ADM, LL, and AFC changed -5.5 (Kg), -2.6 (Kg), -18 (g), 0.35 (d) and 0.30 (d), respectively as the IC of the animal increased by 1%. Estimated simple regression coefficients based on fitting GLM models were found to be -9.83 Kg (SE=1.332 Kg), -6.9 Kg (SE=0.169 Kg), -32 gram (SE=4.2 gram), 0.2087 d (SE=0.08234 d) and 0.0158 m (SE=0.0024 m), respectively and all were statistically significant (p < 0.05).     
Conclusion: This research indicated that different Quantiles of some productive and reproductive traits of Iranian dairy cows are not equally affected by inbreeding phenomenon suggesting that Quantile regression models are needed to be utilized in the future research for evaluating the impacts of inbreeding on the other traits, which are of great economic importance.

References

Amirzadeh Shomali H, 2012. Investigating the effects of inbreeding on some traits associated with production of Sarabi cow.MSc Thesis, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Tabriz.
AtashiH, Sayyadnejad MB and Asaadi A, 2011. The effect of inbreeding on lactation performance in Holstein cows of Iran. Iranian Journal of Applied Animal Science 1:253-256.
Armbruster P and Reed DH, 2005. Inbreeding depression in benign and stressful environments. Heredity 95:235-42.
Barjasteh SH, Shadparvar AA and Mirhosseini SZ, 2012. Effect of inbreeding on economic performance of Iranian Holsteins. Journal of Livestock Research. 1:9-18.
Behmaram R, Esrafili Tazeh Kandemohammadyieh M, Hedayat Evrigh N, 2017. The effect of inbreeding on some productive and reproductive traits of Holstein cows in Moghan Agro-Industrial Company. Research on Animal Production 18:168-176 (In Persian).
Berg P, 2003. EVA version 1.4. Evolutionary algorithm for mate selection. User's guide. Danish Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Foulum, Denmark.
Biffani S, Samoré AB and Canavesi F, 2002. Inbreeding depression for production, reproduction and functional traits in Italian Holstein cattle. Proc. 7th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production, Montpellier, France, Pp. 183-186.
Bijlsma R, Bundgaard J and Boerema AC, 2000. Does inbreeding affect the extinction risk of small populations? Predictions from Drosophila. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 13:502-514.
 
Bijlsma R, Bundgaard J and Van Putten WF, 1999. Environmental dependence of inbreeding depression and purging in Drosophila melanogaster. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 12:1125-1137.
Bijlsma R, Westerhof MDD, Roekx LP and Pen I, 2010. Dynamics of genetic rescue in inbred Drosophila melanogaster populations. Conservation Genetics 11:449-462.
Casanova C, Hagger C and Kuenzi N, 1992. Inbreeding in Swiss Braunvieh and its influence on breeding values predicted from a repeatability animal model. Journal of Dairy Science 75:1119-1126.
Chen C 2005. An Introduction to Quantile Regression and the QUANTREG Procedure. SUGI 30, Statistics and Data Analysis, Paper 213-30, Pp. 1-24.
Croquet C, Mayeres P, Gillon A, Vanderick S and Gengler N, 2006. Inbreeding depression for global and partial economic indexes, production, type, and functional traits. Journal of Dairy Science 89:2257-2267.
Demontis D, Pertoldi C, Loeschcke V, Mikkelsen K, Axelsson T and Kristensen TN, 2009. Efficiency of selection, as measured by single nucleotide polymorphism variation, is dependent on inbreeding rate in Drosophila melanogaster. Molecular Ecology 18:4551-4563.
Derose MA and Roff DA, 1999. A comparison of inbreeding depression in life-history and morphological traits in animals. Evolution 53:1288-1292.
Faraji-Arough H, Aslaminejad AA and Farhangfar H, 2011. Estimation of genetic parameters and trends for age at first calving and calving interval in Iranian Holstein cows. Journal of Research in Agricultural Science 7:79-87.
Farhangfar H and Naeemipour Younesi H, 2007. Estimation of Genetic and Phenotypic Parameters for Production and Reproduction Traits in Iranian Holsteins. Journal of Science and Technology of Agriculture and Natural Resources 11:431-441 (In Persian).
Fioretti M, Rosati A, Pieramati C and Van Vleck LD, 2002. Effect of including inbreeding coefficients for animal and dam on estimates of genetic parameters and prediction of breeding values for reproductive and growth traits of Piedmontese cattle. Livestock Production Science 74:137-145.
Filho JCR, Verneque RDS, Torres RDA, Lopez PS, Raidan FSS and Toral FLB, 2015. Inbreeding on productive and reproductive traits of dairy Gyr cattle. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia 44:174-179.
Fleming A, Abdalla EA, Maltecca C and Baes CF, 2018. Invited review: Reproductive and genomic technologies to optimize breeding strategies for genetic progress in dairy cattle. Archives Animal Breeding 61:43-57.
Gholambabaeian MM, Rashidi A, Razmkabir M and Mirzamohammadi E, 2012. Inbreeding coefficient estimate and its effects on pre-weaning traits in Moghani sheep. The 5th National Congress on Animal Science. Isfahan University of Technology Pp. 71-75 (In Persian).
Gholizadeh S, Ansari Mahyari S, Riasi A and Rokouei M, 2013. Estimation of inbreeding coefficient and its effect on some reproductive traits of dairy cattle herds. Iranian Journal of Animal Science Research 5:251-256 (In Persian).
González-Recio O, López de Maturana E and Gutiérrez JP, 2007. Inbreeding depression on female fertility and calving ease in Spanish dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 90:5744-5752.
Hudson GF and Van Vleck LD, 1984. Inbreeding of artificially bred dairy cattle in the Northeastern United States. Journal of Dairy Science 67:161-170.
Hodges JTL, McGillivray BJ, Hiley PG and Ellis S, 1979. Inbreeding levels and their effect on milk, fat and calving interval in Holstein-Friesian cows. Canadian Journal of Animal Science Pp.153-158.
Khalaj Zadeh S, 2013. Genetic parameters estimation of age at first calving and its effect on productive traits of Holstein dairy cows. Animal Science Journal (Pajouhesh & Sazandegi) 103:15-24 (In Persian).
Koenker R, and Bassett GW, 1978. Regression Quantiles. Econometrica 46:33-50.
Kristensen TN and Sørensen AC, 2005. Inbreeding lessons from animal breeding, evolutionary biology and conservation genetics. Journal of Animal Science 80:121-133.
Kristensen TN, Pedersen KS, Vermeulen CJ and Loeschcke V, 2010. Research on inbreeding in the ‘omic’ era. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 25:44-52.
Kristensen TN, Dahlgaard J and Loeschcke V, 2003. Effects of inbreeding and environmental stress on fitness using Drosophila buzzatii as a model organism. Conservation Genetics 4:453-465.
Leberg PL and Firmin BD, 2008. Role of inbreeding depression and purging in captive breeding and restoration programmes. Molecular Ecology. 17:334-343.
Liao W and Reed DH, 2009. Inbreeding environment interactions increase extinction risk. Animal Conservation 12:54-61.
Mendes Malhado CH, Mendes Malhado AC, Carneiro PLS, Ramos AA, Carrillo JA and Pala A, 2013. Inbreeding depression on production and reproduction traits of buffaloes from Brazil. Journal of Animal Science 84:289-295.
Miglior F, Szkotnicki B and Burnside EB, 1992. Analysis of levels of inbreeding and inbreeding depression in Jersey cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 75:1112-1118.
Mikkelsen K, Loeschcke V and Kristensen TN, 2010. Trait specific consequences of fast and slow inbreeding: Lessons from captive populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Conservation Genetics 11:479-488.
Mirzamohamadi E and Rashidi A, 2013. Estimate of (co)variance components and effects of inbreeding on production traits in Holstein cows at hot region of Iran. Animal Science Journal (Pajouhesh and sazandegi.( 100:45-52.
Nickerson SC, 1999. Milk Production: Factors affecting milk composition. In book: milk quality, edited by Harding F, Aspen Publishers, Inc. Gaithersburg, Maryland, Aspan, First edition. Pp. 3-24.
Nilforooshan MA and Edriss MA, 2004. Effect of age at first calving on some productive and longevity traits in Iranian Holsteins of the Isfahan province. Journal of Dairy Science 87:2130-2135.
Panetto JCC, Gutiérrez JP, Ferraz JBS, Cunha DG and Golden BL, 2010. Assessment of inbreeding depression in a Guzerat dairy herd: Effects of individual increase in inbreeding coefficients on production and reproduction. Journal of Dairy Science 93:4902-4912.
Parland MS, Kearney JF, Rath M and Berry DP, 2007. Inbreeding effects on milk production, calving performance, fertility, and conformation in Irish Holstein-Friesians. Journal of Dairy Science 90:4411-4419.
Pedersen KS, Kristensen TN and Loeschcke V, 2005. Effects of inbreeding and rate on inbreeding in Drosophila melanogaster-Hsp70 expression and fitness. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 18:756-762
Reed DH, Lowe EH, Briscoe DA and Frankham R, 2003. Fitness and adaptation in a novel environment: effect of inbreeding, prior environment, and lineage. Evolution 57:1822-1828.
Reed DH, Nicholas AC and Stratton GE, 2007. Genetic quality of individuals impacts population dynamics. Animal Conservation 10:275-283.
Roff DA, 1998. Effects of inbreeding on morphological and life history traits of the sand cricket, Gryllus firmus. Heredity 81:28-37.                                                                                                      
Rokouei M, Vaez Torshizi R, Moradi Shahrbabak M, Sargolzaei M and Sorensen AC, 2010. Monitoring inbreeding trends and inbreeding depression for economically important traits of Holstein cattle in Iran. Journal of Dairy Science 93:3294–3302.
Sargolzaei M, Iwaisaki H and Colleau JJ, 2006. CFC: A tool for monitoring genetic diversity. Proceedings of 8th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production, 13-18 Aug. Belo Horizonte. Minas Gerais, Brazil, Pp. 27-28.
Shahdadi AR, Hassani S, Saghi DA, Ahani Azari M, Eghbal AR and Rahimi A, 2014. Estimation of genetic parameters of first lactation production and reproduction traits in Iranian Holstein dairy cows. Journal of Ruminant Research 1:109-126 (In Persian).
Smith LA, Cassel BG and Pearson RE, 1998. The effect of inbreeding on lifetime performance of dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science. 81:2729-37.
Swindell WR and Bouzat JL, 2006. Selection and inbreeding depression: effects of inbreeding rate and inbreeding environment. Evolution 60:1014-1022.
Vandewoestijne S, Schtickzelle N and Baguette M, 2008. Positive correlation between genetic diversity and fitness in a large, well-connected metapopulation. BMC Biology 46:1-11.
Whitlock MC, 2002. Selection, load and inbreeding depression in a large metapopulation. Genetics 160:1191-1202.
Wakchaure R and Ganguly S, 2015. Inbreeding, its effects and applications in animal genetics and breeding: A review. International Journal of Emerging Technology and Advanced Engineering 5:73-76.
Wiggans GR, VanRaden PM and Zuurbier J, 1995. Calculation and use of inbreeding coefficients for genetic evaluation of United States dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 78:1584-1590.
Wright LI, Tregenza T and Hosken DJ, 2008. Inbreeding, inbreeding depression and extinction. Conservation Genetics 9:833-843.
Young CW, Tyler WJ, Freeman AE, Voelker HH, McGilliard LD and Ludwick TM, 1969. Inbreeding investigations with dairy cattle in the North Central region of the United States. Agricultural Experiment Station, University of Minnesota, Technical Bulletin 266, Pp. 3-15.
Yavarifard R, Ghavi Hossein-Zadeh N and Shadparvar AA, 2014. Population genetic structure analysis and effect of inbreeding on body weights at different ages in Iranian Mehraban sheep. Journal of Animal Science and Technology 56:1-9.
                                                                                                       
Animal Science Research
Volume 30, Issue 2
November 2020
Pages 25-39

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 15 November 2020
  • Accept Date: 15 November 2020

Share

How to cite

Statistics