Interaction between dietary energy density and feed bunk space on ruminal and blood parameters and fecal properties in Holstein heifers

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Assistant Professor, Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agricultural Science and Engineering, College of Agricultural and Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran

2 Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agricultural Science and Engineering, College of Agricultural and Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran

3 Associate Professor, Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agricultural Science and Engineering, College of Agricultural and Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran

4 PhD in Animal Nutrition, Department of Animal Science, Faculty of agriculture, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran

Abstract

Introduction: Interaction effect between dietary energy density and feed bunk space on ruminal and blood parameters were investigated using 40 Holstein heifers as a factorial experiment in a completely randomized design. Heifers with average age12 to 16 months and weight 363.4±32.8 were received two different diet in energy level (low and high) into two different feed bunk in size (24 and 48 cm). Treatments included: 1) Small feed bunk space (24 cm) with low level of energy, 2) Small feed bunk space (24 cm) with high level of energy, 3) Large feed bunk space (48 cm) with low level of energy and 4) Large feed bunk space (48 cm) with high level of energy. Results revealed that dietary energy was an important factor affecting on total ruminal VFA concentration compared with feed bunk space. Ruminal concentrations of acetate and propionate; and also total VFA concentration were significantly increased in heifers fed low energy levels in comparison with those fed diets contain high energy level. The main reason was attributed to higher dry matter intake and higher nutrient digestibility, especially DM and NDF, in heifers received low dietary energy than high dietary energy.
Material and Methods: Fourteen dairy heifers with an average age of 12-16 months and an average weight of 363 ± 32.8 kg were stratified into 4 groups of 10 in a 2 × 2 factorial, completely randomized design with four treatments and four stall. The experiment period was 100 days. Two levels of energy were adjusted in formulating diets. A diet was formulated according to NRC (2001) requirements as high energy diet (1.32 Mcal/kg DM). For low energy diet, it was diluted by rice hull and wheat bran to meet 90% of NRC (2001) requirements for energy (1.20 Mcal/kg DM). The diets were isoenergetic and isonitrogenous. Treatments included: 1- Small space with low level of energy, 24 cm feed bunk space with diet including 1.20 MCal/kg energy; 2- Small space with high level of energy, 24 cm feed bunk space with diet including 1.32 MCal/kg energy; 3- Large space with low level of energy, 48 cm feed bunk space with diet including 1.20 MCal/kg energy; and 4- Large space with high level of energy, 48 cm feed bunk space with diet including 1.32 MCal/kg energy. Animals were weighed at the bigining and end of experiment. Sampling from feed and orts was carried out at 30, 45, 60 and 70 days. The dry matter intake was daily recorded. Feces samples were taken on days 30, 60 and 90 and dried at 70 ° C for 72 h. Total tract digestibility coefficients were calculated based on the relative concentrations of nutrients and AIA as an internal marker in the feed and feces. Rumen sampling was performed 4 h after morning feeding at the end day of experiment using an oral stomach tube and vaccume pumpe. The ruminal pH was recorded immediately and then rumen liquor was filtered through four layers of muslin cloth and then 2 ml aliquots of filtered liquor was added into tubes containg 40 µl H2SO4 50% and stored at -20 ̊C. Ammonia concentration was determined by Broderick and Kang (1980) and volatile fatty acids was measured using gas chromatography according to Ottensin and Batler (1971). On day 86 blood samples were taken from heifer’s coccygeal vain. Plasma metabolits was measured by Pars Azmoon kits using an autoanalyser. Chemical analysis of sample done according to AOAC (1990). Data were analyzed as a complete factorial design with 2 levels of feed bunk space and 2 levels of dietary energy levels design using the GLM procedures of SAS (version 9.4, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC).
Results and discussion: The results revealed that the dietary energy level factor had a more decisive role in the final concentration of volatile fatty acids in ruminal fluid compared to the feed bunk length factor. However, the concentration of acetate, propionate and consequently, total volatile fatty acids for treatments with low energy levels were significantly higher compared to treatments with high energy levels and the reason can be higher dry matter consumption and also higher digestibility of nutrients, especially DM and NDF in treatments containing lower compared to higher energy levels. Plasma glucose, total protein, albumin and globulin were significantly higher for high energy level treatments compared to low energy level treatments (Table 4). Past studies have shown that propionate is transported from the rumen to the liver after uptake, converted to glucose during the course of gluconeogenesis, and then enters the bloodstream (Daniel and Resende Júnior 2012). In the present study, the results showed the higher the animals' intake of unstructured carbohydrate diets (including starch from cereal grains), the higher their blood glucose concentration. The increase in glucose is due to the increased production of propionate in the rumen as a result of the fermentation of cereal starch (Daniel and Resende Júnior 2012). Therefore, in the present study, the high concentration of glucose in diets containing high energy density compared to diets containing low energy density can be related to the higher concentration of non-fiber carbohydrates. According to the findings of the present study, lower energy levels and larger manger space can lead to improved ruminal parameters and physicochemical properties of feces in growing heifers. Finally, the finding of the current study could be used as a guide to better management of dairy heifers.
Keywords: Blood parameters, Diet energy density, Fecal properties, Feed bunk space, Holstein heifers and Ruminal fermentation parameters

Keywords

Main Subjects


Abramson SM, Bruckental I, Lipshitz L, Moalem U, Zamwel S and Arieli A, 2005. Starch digestion site: influence of ruminal and abomasal starch infusion on starch digestion and utilization in dairy cows. Animal Science 80: 201-207
AOAC, 1990. Official methods of analysis of the AOAC, 15th ed. Association of official analytical chemists.
Arlington VA, Abramson SM, Bruckental I, Lipshitz L, Moalem U, Zamwel S, and Arieli A, 2005. Starch digestion site: influence of ruminal and abomasal starch infusion on starch digestion and utilization in dairy cows. Journal of Animal Science 80:201–207.
Banakar PS, Anand Kumar N and Shashank CG, 2018. Physically effective fibre in ruminant nutrition: A. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry 7:303-308.
Berthiaume R, Benchaar C, Chaves AV, Tremblay GF, Castonguay Y, Bertrand A, Bélanger G, Michaud R, Lafrenière C, McAllister TA and Brito AF, 2010. Effects of nonstructural carbohydrate concentration in alfalfa on fermentation and microbial protein synthesis in continuous culture. Journal of Dairy Science 93:693–700.
Broderick GA and Kang JH, 1980. Automated simultaneous determination of ammonia and total amino acids in ruminal fluid and in vitro media. Journal of Dairy Science 63:64–75.
Broderick GA, Luchini ND, Reynal SM, Varga GA and Ishler VA, 2008. Effect on production of replacing dietary starch with sucrose in lactating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 91:4801–4810.
Broderick GA, Udén PE, Murphy ML and Lapins AI, 2004. Sources of variation in rates of in vitro ruminal protein degradation. Journal of Dairy Science 87:1345–1359.
Coblentz WK, Akins MS, Esser NM, Ogden RK and Gelsinger SL, 2018. Effects of straw processing and pen overstocking on the growth performance and sorting characteristics of diets offered to replacement Holstein dairy heifers. Journal of Dairy Science 101:1074-1087.
Coblentz WK, Esser NM, Hoffman PC and Akins MS, 2015 Growth performance and sorting characteristics of corn silage-alfalfa haylage diets with or without forage dilution offered to replacement Holstein dairy heifers. Journal of Dairy Science 98:8018–8034.
Daniel JL and Resende Júnior JC, 2012. Absorption and metabolism of volatile fatty acids by rumen and omasum. Ciência e Agrotecnologia 36:93–99.
Greter AM, DeVries TJ and Von Keyserlingk MA, 2008. Nutrient intake and feeding behavior of growing dairy heifers: Effects of dietary dilution. Journal of Dairy Science 91:2786–2795.
Greter AM, Kitts BL and DeVries TJ, 2011. Limit feeding dairy heifers: Effect of feed bunk space and provision of a low-nutritive feedstuff. Journal of Dairy Science 94:3124–3129.
Hall MB, Larson CC and Wilcox CJ, 2010. Carbohydrate source and protein degradability alter lactation, ruminal, and blood measures. Journal of Dairy Science 93:311–322.
Harmon DL, Yamka RM and Elam NA, 2004. Factors affecting intestinal starch digestion in ruminants: A review. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 84:309–318.
Hoffman PC, Brehm NM, Price SG and Prill-Adams A, 1996. Effect of accelerated postpubertal growth and early calving on lactation performance of primiparous Holstein heifers. Journal of Dairy Science 79:2024–2031.
Hoffman PC, Simson CR and Wattiaux M, 2007. Limit feeding of gravid Holstein heifers: Effect on growth, manure nutrient excretion, and subsequent early lactation performance. Journal of Dairy Science 90:946–954.
Huntington GB, 1997. Starch utilization by ruminants: from basics to the bunk. Journal of Animal Science 75:852–867.
Huntington GB, Harmon DL and Richards CJ, 2006. Sites, rates, and limits of starch digestion and glucose metabolism in growing cattle. Journal of Animal Science 84(suppl_13):E14-E24.
Hutjens M, 1999. Evaluating Manure on the Farm Extension Dairy Specialist, University of Illinois, Urbana.
Keys JE, Pearson RE and Thompson PD, 1978. Effect of feedbunk stocking density on weight gains and feeding behavior of yearling Holstein heifers. Journal of Dairy Science 61:448–454.
Keyserlingk MAG, 2007. Dietary forage concentration affects the feed sorting behavior of lactating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 90, 5572–5579.
Kovács L, Rózsa L, Pálffy M, Hejel P, Baumgartner W and Szenci O, 2020. Subacute ruminal acidosis in dairy cows-physiological background, risk factors and diagnostic methods. Veterinarska stanica 51:5–17.
Lascano GJ, Koch LE and Heinrichs AJ, 2016. Precision-feeding dairy heifers a high rumen-degradable protein diet with different proportions of dietary fiber and forage-to-concentrate ratios. Journal of Dairy Science 99:7175–7190.
Longenbach JI, Heinrichs AJ, Graves RE, 1999. Feed bunk length requirements for Holstein dairy heifers. Journal of Dairy Science 82:99-109.
Mohammadi A, Fatehi F, Zali A and Ganjkhanlou M, 2018.The study of interaction effects of feed bunk space and forage particle size on feeding behaviors in female Holstein calves. Iranian Journal of Animal Science 49:285–295.
Mohammadi A, Fatehi F, Zali A, Ganjkhanlou M and Sarzaem A, 2020. The study of effects of feed bunk space and forage particle size on digestibility and fecal properties in Holstein female calves. Animal Production. 22:259-269.
Mohammadi, A., Fatehi, F. Zali, A. and Ganjkhanlou. M. (2019). The investigation of interaction effects of feed bunk space and forage particle size on performance and feed consumption intensity within hours after feed delivery in Holstein female calves. Journal of Animal Science Researches, 28(4), 83–98. (in Persian).
National Research Council, 2001. NRC. Nutrient requirements of dairy cattle. Washington, DC. National Academy of Sciences, 381.
Ottenstein DM and Bartley DA, 1971. Improved gas chromatography separation of free acids C2-C5 in dilute solution. Analytical Chemistry. 43:952-955.
Pino, B. Kumar, A.C.S. & Lakhani, N. (2018). Physically effective fibre in ruminant nutrition: A review. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry, 7(4), 303–308.
Russell RW, Moss L, Schmidt SP and Young JW, 1986. Effects of body size on kinetics of glucose metabolism and on nitrogen balance in growing cattle. The Journal of Nutrition. 116:2229–2243.
Sannes RA, Messman MA and Vagnoni DB, 2002. Form of rumen-degradable carbohydrate and nitrogen on microbial protein synthesis and protein efficiency of dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 85:900–908.
SAS Institute, 2011. SAS/IML 9.3 user's guide. Sas Institute.
Satter, L.D. and Slyter, L.L. (1974). Effect of ammonia concentration on rumen microbial protein production in vitro. British Journal of Nutrition, 32,199–210.
Van Soest PV, Robertson JB, and Lewis BA, 1991. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of dairy science 74:3583–3597.
Zanton GI and Heinrichs AJ, 2009. Limit-Feeding with Altered Forage-to-Concentrate Levels in Dairy Heifer Diets1. The Professional Animal Scientist 25:393–403.
Zebeli Q, Tafaj M, Junck B, Ölschläger V, Ametaj BN and Drochner W, 2008. Evaluation of the response of ruminal fermentation and activities of nonstarch polysaccharide-degrading enzymes to particle length of corn silage in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 91, 2388–2398.
Zhang J, Shi H, Wang Y, Li S, Cao Z, Ji S, He Y and Zhang H. 2017. Effect of dietary forage to concentrate ratios on dynamic profile changes and interactions of ruminal microbiota and metabolites in Holstein heifers. Frontiers in Microbiology. 8:2206–2224.