Influence of processing on digestibility and nano-molecular basis of sorghum grain

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

Abstract

Introduction: Processing have an impact on nano-molecular basis, which increase digestion of starch. Heat processing destroys the crystalline nature of a starch granule making the surface of the starch more available to digestive solvents and enzymes as well as to the rumen microbes (Bdour et al. 2014). The in situ nylon bag technique is widely used to characterize the disappearance of feeds from rumen (woods et al. 2002). In situ incubation is a principle method for the estimation of ruminal degradability of dry matter and crude protein, because it is simple, does not require specific equipment and could be applied in every research laboratory (Alexandrow 1998). In many protein evaluation systems for ruminants, the nylon bag technique is the standard method used for calculating the amount of protein escaping rumen fermentation (Cone et al. 2002). A scanning electron microscope (SEM) is a type of electron microscope that produces images of a sample by scanning the surface with a focused beam of electrons. The electrons interact with atoms in the sample, producing various signals that contain information about the sampleʼs surface topography and composition. Accordingly, scanning electron microscope (SEM) can achieve resolution better than 1 nanometer (Stokes 2008). This experiment was conducted to investigate the digestibility of dry matter and crude protein of sorghum grain in the rumen and therefore, investigate changes in nano-molecular basis.
Material and methods: In this study sorghum grain was processed using methods of steam flaking, roasting and microwaving. Feed samples were dried in an oven at 90°C for 48 h and the dry matter (DM) content was calculated. Then, ground samples were analyzed for ash (AOAC, 2005). Determinations of N were conducted using the Kjeldahl method in an automated Kjelfoss apparatus (Foss Electric, Copenhagen, Denmark). Neutral-detergent fiber (NDF) and acid-detergent fiber (ADF) were determined by the detergent procedures of Van Soest et al. (1991). Acid-detergent insoluble nitrogen (ADIN) was determined as nitrogen in acid-detergent residue. Ether extract (EE) was determined by extracting the sample with ether (AOAC 2005). Degradation characteristics of feeds were calculated after the incubation of 5 g samples of row, steam flaked, roasted, and microwaved sorghum grains (ground at 2 mm) in nylon bags. The bag size was 6×12 cm. The bags were incubated in the rumen of two cannulated sheep for 0, 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 48 h. Retrieved bags were washed under running water until the water was clear. Immediately after removal from the rumen, the bags frozen at −18 °C. At the end of the collections, they were unfrozen and washed together with the zero time bags (not incubated in the rumen) for 20 min and then dried at 80°C for 48 h. The residues were weighted and submitted for analysis. For each bag, the residue was analyzed for DM and nitrogen. Feed residues were recovered from each bag and stored for Kjeldahl nitrogen. The model of p=a+b(1-e-ct) was used for the determination of degradation characteristics, in which p is the actual degradation of CP and DM after t, a is the intercept of the degradation curve at time zero, b is the potential degradability of the component of the slowly soluble CP and DM, which will in time be degraded, c represents the constant degradability rate of b at time t, and t is the incubation time. In order to provide SEM images, scanning electron microscopy (Field Emission Tescan mirca 3) was used in the central laboratory of University of Tabriz. The values of a (% solubility) and b (potentially degradable fraction) and deviation of error were determined.  Data obtained from in situ study was subjected to analysis of variance as a completely randomized design by the GLM procedure of SAS software and treatment means were compared by the Duncan test.
Results and discussion: In situ results showed that steam flaking of sorghum grain have the most digestibility compared with other treatments, but it was not significant. Steam flaking of sorghum grain reduced nutritional restriction (Teurer et al. 1999) and in many studies has been showed decreases in tannin and phenolic compounds. Microwave processing reduced digestibility; however, it was not significant. Lewandowicz et al. (2002) reported that microwaving reduced starch solubility, because high heat treatment in microwaved starch can create resistance and continual basis in granular structures. Processing significantly decreased crude protein digestibility in all three treatments (p < 0.05) that previous studies have confirmed these results (Parnian 2008, Nickhah et al. 2003, Hamaker 1987).
Thermal process reduces protein digestibility in the rumen via denaturing the protein and formation of protein-protein and protein-carbohydrate bonds (Anonymous 2001). Dandy et al. (1995) also concluded wet sorghum baking reduced digestibility. Preston (1998) reported that processing and steaming of corn and sorghum grains reduced solubility of proteins. Also, access to lysine amino acids reduced by flakes density reduces. Scanning electron micrographs in all three treatments showed that processing destructed protein matrix and increased enzymes access to starch granules and increased their digestibility. In steam flaking treatment, granule surfaces were attacked by microorganisms and protein matrix destructed more than other treatments. Also, terminal processing in all three treatments gelatinated the starch and increased average of scale of granules. In addition to the importance of starch digestion, the increase in viscosity during gelatinization may also positively affect physical quality of processed feeds through increasing in binding between feed particles. Svihus et al. (2004) reported that pelleting can improve feed integrity by increasing binding between particles. Gelatinization of starch greatly increases α-amylase accessibility to amylose and amylopectin glucose chains and so, increases the rate of starch digestion. The number of created orifices is explanatory for degradability values. Benmoussa et al. (2006) concluded that number and scale of granules have positive effects on digestive properties. In this study, despite of smaller number and smaller size of orifices in steam flaking treatment than other treatments (against further degradability of steam flaking than others treatments), SEM images of incubated steam flaking showed that granules were processed completely. Therefore, lots of uniformity and meltingcan be justified as its high degradability.
Conclusion: Electron microscopy images showed that the number and size of holes (nano-sized) per unit area of ​​treatments were highly correlated with the degree of degradability. Steam flaked treatment has caused more gelatinization in starch granules as the size of the granules has increased more than the control treatment and other treatments. Steam flake processing shows better degradability properties than other treatments and provides higher amounts of nutrients to microorganisms.

Aharoni Y, Gilbad N and Silanikov N, 1998. Models of suppressive effect of tannin on ruminal degradation by compartmental models. Animal Feed Science Tecnology 71:251-267.
Alexandrov AN, 1998. Effect of ruminal exposure and subsequent microbial contamination on dry matter and protein degradability of various feedstuffs. Animal Feed Science and Technology 71:99-107.
Anonymous, 2001. Nutrient requirements of dairy cattle. National Research Council. Washington, DC.UAS.
AOAC, 2002. Official Methods of Analysis. 52th Ed. AOAC International, Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA.
Azarfar A, 1996. The use of grain sorghum in diets of feedlot ghezel sheeps, MSc Thesis, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Tabriz (In Persian).
Bdour MA, Al-Rabadi GJ, Al-Ameiri NS, Mahadeen A and Aaludatt MH, 2014. Microscopic Analysis of Extruded and Pelleted Barley and Sorghum Grains. Jordan Journal Biologycal Science 7:227-231.
Belton PS, Delgadillo I, Halford NG and Shewry PR, 2006. Kafirin structure and functionality. Journal of Cereal Science 44:272–286.
Benmoussa M, Suhendra B, Aboubacar A and Hamaker BR, 2006. Distinctive sorghum starch granule morphologies appear to improve raw starch digestibility. Starch 58:92-99.
Ciacci C, Maiuri L, Caporaso N, Del C, Giudice L, Massardo DR, Pontieri Pdi, Fonzo N Bean, SR, Ioerger B and Londei M, 2007. Celiac disease: In vitro and In vivo safety and palatability of wheat – free sorghum food products. Clinical Nutrition 26:799-805.
Cone JW, Kamman AA, Van Gelder AH and Hindle VA, 2002. Rumen escape protein in concentrate ingredients determined with the nylon bag and enzymatic techniques. Animal Feed Science and Technology 97:247-254.
Dendy DAV, 1995. Sorghum and millets: production and importance. In: Dendy editor. Sorghum andmillets: chemistry and technology. St. Paul, Minn. American Association of Cereal Chemists.
Duodu KG, Nunes A, Delgadillo I, Parker ML, Mills ENC, Belton PS and Taylor JRN, 2002. Effect of grain structure and cooking on sorghum and maize in vitro protein digestibility. Journal of Cereal Science 35:161–174.
Ghaderi M, Alami M, Sadeghi A, ghorbani M and Azizi MH, 2011. Chemical composition and influence of some therminal processing methods on phenolic commpounds amount in two types of Iranian acorn varieties. Journal of Food Research 21:421-431.
Goodhew PJ, Humphreys J and Beanland R, 2000. Electron microscopy and analysis. CRC
Herrera-Saldana R, Huber JT and Poore MH, 1990. Dry matter, crude protein and starch degradability of five cereal grains. Journal of Dairy Science 73:2386-2393.
Hamaker BR, Kirleis AW, Butler LG, Axtell JD and Mertz ET, 1987. Improving the in vitro protein digestibility of sorghum with reducing agents. Proceedings of the National Academic Science 84:626-628.
Holm J, Lundquist I, Bjorck I, Eliasson AC and Asp NG, 1988. Relationship between degree of gelatinisation, digestion rate in vitro, and metabolic response in rats. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 47:1010–1016.
Knudsen KB and Munck L, 1985. Dietary fiber contents and compositions of sorghum and sorghum-based foods. Journal of Cereal Science 3:153-164
Kochaki A, Khiyabani H and Sarmadnia GHH, 1987. Producing crops. Ferdowsi University of Mashhad.
Lewandowicz G, Jankowski T and Fornal J, 2000. Effect of microwave radiation on physico-chemical properries and structure of cereal starches. Carbohydrate Polymers 42:193-199.
Makkar HPS and Becker K, 1996. A bioassay for tannins. In: Polyphenols Communications, vol. 96. Proceedings of the XVIIIth International Conference on Polyphenols, Bordeaux pp:197–198.
Mertz ET, Hassen MM, Cairns-Whittern C, Kirleis AW, Tu L and Axtell JD, 1984. Pepsin digestibility of proteins in sorghum and other major cereals. Proceedings of the National Academic Science 81:1-2.
Nickhah A, 2003. Influence of processing methods on digestibility of sorghum grain and broomcorn in the rumen. Journal of Sciences and Technology of Agriculture and Natural Resources 7:169-177.
Parnian F, 2008. The effects of microwave radiation on digestibility and degradability of grain sorghum by in vivo, in vitro and in situ methods, MSc Thesis, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Tabriz (In Persian).
Paya H, 2007. Determination of digestibility and degradability of some feedstuffs by in vitro, in situ and in vivo methods, MSc Thesis, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Tabriz (In Persian).
Preston RL, 1998. Changes in sorghum and corn grains during steps in steam-flaking process. Journal of Dairy Science 81:317-321.
Rooney LW and Pflugfelder RL, 1986. Factor affecting starch digestibility with special emphasis on sorghum and corn. Journal of Animal Science 63:1607-1623.
Shirmohammadi SH, 2014. Influence of steam flaking and roasting on nano-molecular basis and
digestibility of barley grain, Mac Thesis, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Tabriz (In Persian).
Showravg P, Jalilian S,  Fatahnia F, Sadeghi AA and Mehrabi AA, 2017. The effects ‘of irradiation from gamma, electron beam, microwave and infrared sources on ruminal degradability and in vitro digestibility of soybean meal. Journal of Animal Science researches (Agriculture Science) 27:217-230 (In Persian).
Stokes D, 2008. Principles and practice of variable pressure. In: Environmental scanning electron microscopy (VP-ESEM). John Wiley & Sons. USA.
Svihus B, Uhlen AK and Harstad OM, 2005. Effect of starch granule structure, associated components and processing on nutritive value of cereal starch: A review. Animal Feed Science and Technology 122:303-320.
Taghizadeh A and Janmohammadi H, 2012. Characterization of degradation and fermentation of food by in situ and in vitro methods. Asian Journal of Animal Science, 22: 1-16.
Taghizadeh A and Nemati Z, 2008. Degradability characteristics of treated and untreated barley grain using in situ technique. American Journal of Animal and Veterinary Science 3:53-56.
Theuer CB, Huber JT, Delgado Elorduy A and Wanderley R, 1999. Invited review: Summary of steam_Flaking corn or sorghum grain for lactating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 82:1950-1959.
Van Soest PJ, 1994. Nutritional ecology of the ruminant. Cornell University Press. Ithaca, NY. USA.
Vanzant ES, Cochran RC and Titgemeyer EC, 1998. Standardization of in situ techniques for ruminant feedstuff evaluation. Journal of Animal Science 76:2717-2729
Woods VB, Moloney AP and O’Mara FP, 2003. The nutritive value of concentrate feedstuffs for ruminant animals: Part II: In situ ruminal degradability of crude protein. Animal Feed Science and Technology 110:131-143.
Wong JH, Lau T, Cai N, Singh J, Pedersen JF, Vensel WH, Hurkman WJ, Wilson JD, Lemaux PG and Buchanan BB, 2009. Digestibility protein and starch from sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) is linked to biochemical and structural features of grain endosperm. Journal of Cereal Science 49:73–82.