In vitro fermentation and nutrients digestibility parameters of diets containing different levels of sugarcane bagasse

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Student, Department of Animal Science, Ilam University, Iran.

2 Ph.D, Department of Animal Science, Ilam University, Iran.

3 Professor, Department of Animal Science, Ilam University, Iran.

4 Assistant Professor, Department of Animal Science, Ilam University, Iran.

Abstract

In vitro fermentation and nutrients digestibility parameters of diets containing different levels of sugarcane bagasse


Introduction: The high cost and scarcity of feed, and increasing demand for animal product such as meat and milk increased the need for efficient utilization of high lignocellulose roughages for ruminant production. Iran is one of the arid and semi-arid desert regions and is facing a shortage of crops and fodder. On the other hand, there is always the problem of providing cheap and acceptable quality feed for livestock, and one of the ways to solve this problem is to use unusual feed such as crop residues and food factories; But most of these foods have not been studied and their chemical composition and level of consumption for animals are not well known. This requires the study of the effect of different levels of food sources on the diet and the determination of animal production responses. Sugarcane bagasse can be used as a substitute for part of the diet forage (wheat straw) for animal feed due to its high cellulose content and high palatability. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of diets containing different levels of old or fresh bagasse as a substitute for wheat straw in ewes's diet on chemical composition, fermentation parameters and digestibility of dry matter and organic matter by gas production method. The in vitro gas production system helps to better quantify nutrient utilization, and its accuracy in describing digestibility in animals has been validated in numerous experiments. Based on the strong relationship between measured digestibility and that predicted from gas production, regression equations have been developed and the method has been standardized.
Material and methods: A sample of bagasse was obtained from a sugarcane factory located in Khuzestan province and a sample of wheat straw was obtained from agricultural farms and immediately transferred to a nutrition laboratory. The old bagasse was stored in storage for a year. Experimental diets were adjusted based on the nutrient requirements of ewes (NRC, 2007) and included 50% forage (20% alfalfa and 30% straw) and 50% concentrate (32.5% barley, 10% soybean meal, 7% wheat bran and 0.5% of vitamin and mineral supplements were based on dry matter. The experimental treatments, old or fresh bagasse was replaced with wheat straw at different levels, so that the experimental diets in the first experiment (old bagasse) included: Diet 1: Diet containing 30% wheat straw, Diet 2: Diet containing 22.5% Wheat straw and 7.5% old bagasse, Diet 3: Diet containing 15% wheat straw and 15% old bagasse, Diet 4: Diet containing 7.5% wheat straw and 22.5% old bagasse and Diet 5: Diet containing 30 Percentage of old bagasse; And in the second experiment (fresh bagasse) including: diet 1: diet containing 30% wheat straw, diet 2: diet containing 22.5% wheat straw and 7.5% fresh bagasse, diet 3: diet containing 15% wheat straw and 15 Percentage of fresh bagasse, diet 4: diet containing 7.5% wheat straw and 22.5% fresh bagasse and diet 5: diet containing 30% fresh bagasse. The fresh bagasse sample was dried in an oven at 60 ° C for 48 hours and after determining the dry matter content, along with the old bagasse sample, wheat straw and experimental diets ground through a 1-mm screen using a Wiley mill, and analysed for dry matter (DM), organic matter (OM), crude protein (CP) (AOAC, 2019), neutral detergent fibre (NDF), acid detergent fibre (ADF) and acid detergent lignin (ADL) (Van Soest et al., 1991). For measurement of methane production, the final gas production (end of 24 hours) was recorded after 24 hours of incubation of the sample in ruminal fluid + phosphate buffer. Then 10 M sodium hydroxide was added to the contents of the glass bottle to absorb the carbon dioxide gas. After absorbing carbon dioxide (after about 10 minutes), the gas remaining in the syringe or glass bottle will be methane (Fievez et al., 2005). The chemical composition of the treatments statistically analyzed in a completely randomized design and gas production, separation factor, dry matter and organic matter digestibility, microbial mass production and production efficiency and methane production statistically analyzed in a randomized complete block design. Statistical analysis of data was performed using SAS (2006) software.
Results and discussion: The results showed that wheat straw compared to fresh or old bagasse had a higher content of DM, CP, ash, Total gas accumulation 24h (ml), digestibility of DM and OM and lower content of OM, NDF, ADF and ADL (P˂0/05). The ADL and NDF contents of fresh bagasse was lower than old bagasse (P˂0/05). Among the experimental diets, the highest content of DM and ash, and the lowest content of OM and ADF belonged to the diet containing 30 percent wheat straw (P˂0/05). Diets containing different levels of old or fresh bags had higher and lower NDF content, respectively, compared to the diet containing wheat straw (P˂0.05). The digestibility of DM and OM in the diet containing 30 percent of old and fresh bagasse tended to decrease compared to its lower levels (P = 0/08 and 0/07). In general, if the price of each kilogram of wheat straw is low compared to bagasse, it can be suggested that a maximum level of 22.5 percent of bagasse be used instead of wheat straw in the diet of ewes; Of course, the 30 percent bagasse level can also be used with caution. It is recommended to use fresh bagasse instead of old bagasse in the diet of ewes.

Keywords

Main Subjects


Ahmed MH and Babiker SA, 2015. Effect of feeding urea-treated sugar-cane bagasse on properties and quality of fresh meat of Sudan baggara Zebu Bulls. International Journal of Animal Biology 1: 45-49.
Almeida GAP, de Andrade Ferreira M, de Lima Silva J, Chagas JCC, Véras ASC, de Barros LJA and de Almeida GLP, 2018. Sugarcane bagasse as exclusive roughage for dairy cows in smallholder livestock system. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences 3: 379-385.
AOAC, 2019. Official Methods of Analysis, 21st ed. AOAC International, Arlington, VA. Banerjee GC. 1991. A text book of animal husbandry. Oxford and IBH Publishing Co. Pvt. Ltd. 554 pp.
Blummel M, Aiple KP, Steingass H and Becker K, 1999. A note on the stoichiometrical relationship of short chain fatty acid production and gas evolution in vitro in feedstuffs of widely differing quality. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition 81: 157–167.
Brendt A, Henrique W, Lanna PPL, Alleoni GF and Leme PR, 2002. High moisture corn, sugarcane bagasse and corn silage in high concentrate diets. Empty body chemical composition and tissues deposition rates. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia 31: 2105-2112.
Chaji M and Mohammadabadi T, 2012. Determination of Rumen Fungi Growth on Steamtreated Sugarcane Pith by Quantitative Competitive Polymerase Chain Reaction. Animal Nutrition and Feed Technology 12: 47-53.
Costa DA, Souza CL, Saliba EO and Carneiro JC, 2015. Byproducts of sugar cane industry in ruminant. International Journal of Advance Agricultural Research 3: 1–9.
Dijkstra J, Kebreab E, Bannink A, France J and Lopez S 2005. Application of the gas production technique to feed evaluation systems for ruminants. Animal Feed Science and Technology 123: 561-578.
FAO STATS, 2016. Crop Production. FAO Statistics Division, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
Fievez V, Babayemi OJ and Demeyer D, 2005. Estimation of direct and indirect gas production in syringes: A tool to estimate short chain fatty acid production that requires minimal laboratory facilitie. Animal Feed Science and Technology 123: 197–210.
Freitas WR, de Andrade Ferreira M, Silva JL, Véras ASC, Barros LJA, Alves AMSV, Chagas JCC, Siqueira TDQ and de Almeida GAP, 2018. Sugarcane bagasse as only roughage for crossbred lactating cows in semiarid regions. Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira 53: 386–393.
Getachew G, Blummel M, Makkar HPS and Becker K, 1998. In vitro gas measuring techniques for assessment of nutritional quality of feeds: a review. Animal Feed Science and Technology 72: 261-128.
Givens DI, Owen E, Axford RFE and Omed HM, 2000. Forage Evaluation in Ruminant Nutrition. CABI Publishing, Pp: 189-213.
Grabber JH, 2005. How do lignin composition, structure, and crosslinking affect degradability? A review of cell wall model studies. Crop Science 45: 820–831.
Hozhabri F and Singhal KK, 2006. In vitro evaluation of evaluation of sugarcane bagasse. Indian Journal of Animal Nutrition 23: 88-93.
Huque HS and Rahman MM, 2002. Utllization of sugarcane tops and bagasse as roughage sources in growing bulls. Indian Journal of Animal Nutrition l9: 227 -231.
Katoch R, 2022. Nutritional Quality Management of Forages in the Himalayan Region. Springer Press. ISBN 978-981-16-5437-4 (eBook).
Kaur S and Kaushal JR, 2001. Effect of moisture, sodium hydroxide and urea treatments on chemical composition and in vitro and in sacco dry matter digestibility of bagasse in ruminants. Indian Journal of Animal Nutrition 18: 29-35.
Makkar HPS, 2010. In vitro screening of feed resources for efficiency of microbial protein synthesis. In ‘In vitro screening of plant resources for extra-nutritional attributes in ruminants: nuclear and related methodologies’. (Eds PE Vercoe, HPS Makkar) 107-144. (IAEA: Dordrecht, The Netherlands).
Makkar HSP, 2018. Review: Feed demand landscape and implications of food-not feed strategy for food security and climate change. Animal 12: 1744-1754.
Molavian M, Ghorbani GR, Rafiee H and Beauchemin KA, 2020. Substitution of wheat straw with sugarcane bagasse in low-forage diets fed to mid-lactation dairy cows: Milk production, digestibility, and chewing behavior. Journal of Dairy Science 103: 8034-8047.
NRC, 2007. Nutrient requirements of small ruminants: sheep, goats, cervids and new world camelids Natl. Acad. Press, Washington, DC. 
Pereira RAN, Ferreira WM and Garcia SK, 2008. Digestibility of sugar cane bagasse after a NaOH treatment in growing rabbit diets. Zootecnia e Medicina Veterinária 32: 573-577.
Ramli MN, Imura Y, Takayama K and Nakanishi Y, 2005. Bioconversion of sugarcane bagasse with Japanese koji by solid-state fermentation and its effects on nutritive value and preference in goats. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Science 18: 1279–1284.
Reddy GVN, Reddy KJ and Nagalakshmi D, 2002. Effect of expander-extruder processed complete diet containing sugarcane bagasse on growth and nutrient utilization in Ongole bull calves. Indianan Journal of Animal Science 72: 406-409.
Rotz CA and Muck RE, 1994. Changes in forage quality during harvest and storage. In: G. C. Fahey et al. (eds.) Forage quality, evaluation, and utilization. ASA, CSSA, and SSSA, Madi-son, WI. pp. 828-868.
Rotz CA and Abrams SM, 1988. Losses and quality changes during alfalfa hay harvest and storage. Transactions of the ASAE, American Society of Agricultural Engineers 31: 350-355.
Russell JB, O’Connor JD, Fox DG, Van Soest PJ and Sniffen CJ, 1992. A net carbohydrate and protein system for evaluating cattle diets I. Ruminal fermentation. Journal of Animal Science 70: 355-361.
SAS, 2006. Procedures Guide, second ed. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA.
Spanghero M, Chiaravalli M, Colombini S, Fabro C, Froldi F, Mason F, Moschini M, Sarnataro C, Schiavon S and Tagliapietra F, 2019. Rumen Inoculum Collected from Cows at Slaughter or from a Continuous Fermenter and Preserved in Warm, Refrigerated, Chilled or Freeze-Dried Environments for In Vitro Tests. Animals 9 (10): 815-828.
Van Soest PJ, 1994. Nutritional ecology of the ruminant, 2nd ed. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY, USA.
Van Soest PJ, Robertson JB and Lewis BA, 1991. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber and non-starch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science 74: 3593-3597.