The effect of using different wheat straw cultivars in feeding Lori sheep on digestibility, gas production and fermentation and blood parameters in vitro and in vivo

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 بخش علوم دامی، مرکز تحقیقات و آموزش کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی صفی‌آباد-دزفول، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، دزفول، ایران

2 Ramin Agriculture and Natural Resources University of Khuzestan

3 دانشگاه علوم کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی خوزستان

4 Safiabad Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, Agricultural Research, Education and Extention (AREEO), Dezful, Iran.

Abstract

Introduction: Agricultural residues include the materials that remain after harvesting and extracting the main products from the crop, these residues are made of roughage and they have allocated a significant amount of animal feed resources. Straw is regarded as one of the most vital sources of productive organic matter globally and serves as a primary source of animal feed in numerous countries, particularly in arid regions. In these areas, fodder scarcity presents a significant challenge and is a major limiting factor in animal husbandry. Research findings indicate that the nutritional value of cereal straw is influenced by various factors, including differences among cultivars, soil fertility and growing conditions, crop rotation and agricultural practices, fertilization and harvest time and maturity. The primary reason for variations in the nutritional value of straw lines in the ratio of stem to leaf, as well as the quality and nutritional content of different straw components, particularly the stem and leaf. Different wheat varieties have varying fiber content and digestibility. For instance, some wheat varieties bred for higher yield or disease resistance may produce straw with slightly lower digestibility and protein content. Wheat grown in nutrient-rich soils with good water management typically results in straw with higher mineral content (e.g., potassium, calcium, phosphorus) and slightly improved protein content. Conversely, in nutrient-poor soils, the straw tends to have lower nutritional value. Wheat grown in well-managed crop rotations may have better straw quality compared to wheat grown in monoculture systems. In crop rotation, the straw may have higher nutrient levels due to improved soil health, organic matter, and nutrient cycling. Wheat straw from crops fertilized with nitrogen (N) may have slightly better crude protein levels, as nitrogen boosts protein synthesis in plants. However, excessive nitrogen can lead to high fiber content and reduced digestibility. The nutritive value of wheat straw tends to decline as the plant matures. Young wheat straw (from early harvests) is more digestible and has slightly higher protein content compared to mature, fully lignified straw, which is higher in fiber and lower in nutritional value. So, This experiment was performed to investigate the chemical composition and nutritional value of different straw varieties of promising wheat cultivars in comparison with Chamran cultivar in feeding of Lori sheep.
Materials and methods: In this experiment, straw samples from various wheat cultivars were collected, air-dried, and cut into 2-3 cm pieces before being stored in bags for use in different treatments. Then, chemical compounds and including gas production parameters of 17 cultivars of wheat straw varieties were measured, Then 3 wheat straw cultivars that showed the best results were selected along with Chamran cultivar as control groups in a completely randomized design using 16 male Lori sheep (23± 2 kg) were examined. Also, In the present trial, nutrient digestibility, ruminal parameters and blood metabolites were measured too.
Results and discussion: The results showed that the highest amount of crude protein and gas production were related to cultivars S-91-11, S-91-14 and S-91-6 (P <0.05), but did not show a significant difference compared to Chamran cultivar. Three straw cultivars (S-91-11, S-91-14 and S-91-6) had the highest amount of crude protein and the lowest amount of cell wall components compared to other straw cultivars (P <0.05). Digestibility of dry matter, organic matter, crude protein, insoluble fibers in acidic and neutral detergents, ammonia nitrogen and ruminal pH and blood parameters were not affected by selected wheat straw cultivars in experimental diets. The lack of significant differences in protein digestibility across various straw varieties suggests that dietary variations do not influence protein digestion. One key factor influencing nutrient digestibility in the digestive tract is the size of the bacterial population; therefore, the absence of significant differences in microbial populations logically explains the observed similarities in nutrient digestibility.
The average concentration of ruminal ammonia nitrogen under the experimental diets falls within the desired range of 8.5 to 30 mg per 100 ml of rumen fluid. Elevated ruminal ammonia levels enhance microbial activity and fiber digestibility, while a decrease in ammonia concentration serves as a limiting factor for microbial growth in the rumen.
Introduction: Agricultural residues include the materials that remain after harvesting and extracting the main products from the crop, these residues are made of roughage and they have allocated a significant amount of animal feed resources.Straw is regarded as one of the most vital sources of productive organic matter globally and serves as a primary source of animal feed in numerous countries, particularly in arid regions. In these areas, fodder scarcity presents a significant challenge and is a major limiting factor in animal husbandry. Research findings indicate that the nutritional value of cereal straw is influenced by various factors, including differences among cultivars. The primary reason for variations in the nutritional value of straw lies in the ratio of stem to leaf, as well as the quality and nutritional content of different straw components, particularly the stem and leaf. So, This experiment was performed to investigate the chemical composition and nutritional value of different straw varieties of promising wheat cultivars in comparison with Chamran cultivar in feedin of Lori sheep.
Materials and methods: In this experiment, straw samples from various wheat cultivars were collected, air-dried, and cut into 2-3 cm pieces before being stored in bags for use in different treatments. Then, chemical compounds and including gas production parameters of 17 cultivars of wheat straw varieties were measured, Then 3 wheat straw cultivars that showed the best results were selected along with Chamran cultivar as control groups in a completely randomized design using 16 male Lori sheep (23± 2 kg) were examined. Also, In the present trial, nutrient digestibility, ruminal parameters and blood metabolites were measured too.
Results and discussion: The results showed that the highest amount of crude protein and gas production were related to cultivars S-91-11, S-91-14 and S-91-6 (P <0.05), but did not show a significant difference compared to Chamran cultivar. Three straw cultivars (S-91-11, S-91-14 and S-91-6) had the highest amount of crude protein and the lowest amount of cell wall components compared to other straw cultivars (P <0.05). Digestibility of dry matter, organic matter, crude protein, insoluble fibers in acidic and neutral detergents, ammonia nitrogen and ruminal pH and blood parameters were not affected by selected wheat straw cultivars in experimental diets.
Conclusion: In general, according to the results of gas production parameters and measurement of chemical compounds, wheat straw cultivars S-91-11, S-91-6, S-91-14, showed better results than wheat straw of other cultivars and are recommended.
Keywords: Gas production, Blood parameters, Digestibility, Wheat straw, Lori sheep
Conclusion: In general, according to the results of gas production parameters and measurement of chemical compounds, wheat straw cultivars S-91-11, S-91-6, S-91-14, showed better results than wheat straw of other cultivars and are recommended.

Keywords

Main Subjects


 
Adesogan AT, 2002. A critical evaluation of selected nutritive value methods. In Proceeding 13th Annual Florida Ruminant Nutrition Symposium.
An HY, Han JJ, He QN, Zhu YL, Wu P, Wang YC and Xue JF, 2024. Influence of nitrogen application rate on wheat grain protein content and composition in China: A meta-analysis. Agronomy 14;(6): 1164-1176.‏
Anjum MI, Ghazanfar S and Begum I, 2014. Nutritional composition of wheat grains and straw influenced by differences in varieties grown under uniform agronomic practices.‏ International Journal of Veterinary Science 3;(3): 100-104.
AOAC, 1990. Official Methods of Analysis. 15th ed. Assoc. Off. Anal. Chem., Arlington, VA.
Blümmel M, Makkar HP and Becker K, 1997. In vitro gas production: a technique revisited. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition 8;(5): 24-34.
Blu M and Ørskov ER, 1993. Comparison of in vitro gas production and nylon bag degradability of roughages in predicting feed intake in cattle. Animal feed science and technology Jan 1;40(2-3):109-19.
Blümmel M, Karsli A and Russell JR, 2003. Influence of diet on growth yields of rumen micro-organisms in vitro and in vivo: influence on growth yield of variable carbon fluxes to fermentation products. British Journal of Nutrition 90;(3): 625-634.
Brodrick GA and Kang JH, 1980. Automated simultaneous determination of  ammonia and total amino acids in ruminal fluid and in vitro media. Journal of Dairy Science 63:64-75.
Collins SR, Wellner N, Martinez Bordonado I, Harper AL, Miller CN, Bancroft I and Waldron KW, 2014. Variation in the chemical composition of wheat straw: the role of tissue ratio and composition. Biotechnology for Bbiofuels 7;(1): 121-129.‏
Davidson S, Hopkins BA, Diaz DE, Bolt SM, Brownie C, Fellner V and Whitlow LW, 2003. Effects of amounts and degradability of dietary protein on lactation, nitrogen utilization, and excretion in early lactation Holstein cows. Journal of Dairy Science 86; 1681–1689.
Schmidt GH, Vleck LV and Hutjens MF, 1988. Principles of dairy science (No. Ed. 2).
Feyissa F, Tolera A and  Melaku S, 2007. Nutritive value of different varieties and morphological fractions of oats harvested at the soft dough stage. Tropical Science 47;(4): 188-196.‏
Giraldo P, Benavente E, Manzano-Agugliaro F and Gimenez E, 2019. Worldwide research trends on wheat and barley: A bibliometric comparative analysis. Agronomy 9;(7): 352-361.‏
Gross JJ, 2022. Limiting factors for milk production in dairy cows: perspectives from physiology and nutrition. Journal of Animal Science 100;(3), skac044.‏
Iiyama K, Lam TBT and Stone BA, 1990. Phenolic acid bridges between polysaccharides and lignin in wheat internodes. Phytochemistry 29: 733-737.
Ivan M, Neill L, Forster R, Alimon R, Rode LM and Entz T, 2000. Effects of Isotricha, Dasytricha, Entodinium, and total fauna on ruminal fermentation and duodenal flow in wethers fed different diets. Journal of Dairy Science 83: 776–787.
Jolazadeh A, Azizi A, Sharifi A, Memarzadeh F, Fallali N and Imani-Rad E, 2025. Evaluation of camelina seed pods as a novel feed ingredient for ruminants: nutritional value, fermentation characteristics and nutrient digestibility. Veterinary and Animal Science 29:100477.‏
Kapper BS, 1988. Genetic variation in the feeding value of cereal straw. Animal Feed Science and Technology 21: 127-140.
Karimizadeh E, Chaji M and Mohammadabadi T, 2017. Effects of physical form of diet on nutrient digestibility, rumen fermentation, rumination, growth performance and protozoa population of finishing lambs. Animal Nutrition 3;(2), 139-144.‏
Kaufman, W, 2001. Influence of the composition of the ration and the feeding frequency on pH regulation in the rumen and on feed Intake in ruminants. Livestock Production Science 3: 103-110.
Kellems R O and Church DC, 2009. Livestock Feeds and Feedings. 6 th Edition. Prentice HALL. Inc.
Keyserlingk von, MAG, Swift ML, Puchala R, Shelford JA, 1997. Degradability Characteristics of Dry Matter and Crude Protein of Forages in Ruminants. Journal Animal Feed Science Technology. 57: 291- 311.
Kim SH and Sung HG, 2022. Effects of different Fiber substrates on in vitro rumen fermentation characteristics and rumen microbial Community in Korean Native Goats and Hanwoo Steers. Fermentation 8;(11): 611-619.‏
Moghaddam M, Taghizadeh A, Nobakht A and Ahmadi A, 2011. Nutritive value of grape pomace and raisin vitis leaves using nylon bags and gas production techniques. Iranian Journal of Animal Science Research 3;(4): 435-443.
McDonald P, Edwards RA, Greenhalgh JF and Morgan CA, 1995 Animal nutrition. ed. 5.
McDonald p, Edwards RA and Greehalgh jFD, 2010. Animal nutrition. 7 th edition. 
Makkar HPS, 2003. Effects and fate of tannins in ruminant animals, adaptation to tannins, and strategies to overcome detrimental effects of feeding tannin-rich feeds. Small Ruminant Research 49(3): 241–256. Menke KH and Steingass H, 1988. Estimation of the energetic feed value obtained from chemical analysis and gas production using rumen fluid. Animal Research and Development 28: 7–55.
Mertens DR, 1997. Creating a system for meeting the fiber requirements of dairy Cow. Journal of Dairy Science 80:1463-1481
Mertens DR. 2009. Impact of NDF content and digestibility on dairy cow performance.‏ Advances in Dairy Technology 21: 191-201.
National Research concil (NRC), 1989. Nutrient Requirments of Dairy cattle. Six revised Edition, Washington DC. USA.
Pearce GR, 1983. Variability in the composition and in vitro digestibility of cereal .G. Packham. pp. 417-420.
Ramirez RG, Gonzalez H, Morales R, Cerrillo A, Julrez A, Garsia GJ and Guerrero M, 2009. Chemical composition and dry matter digestion of some native and cultivated grasses in Mexico. Czech Journal of Animal Science 54;(4): 150-162.‏
Sadeghi S, Valizadeh R, Naserian A and Tahmasebi A, 2015. Nutritive value of wheat straw treated with gaseous or liquid ammonia trough nylon bag and in vitro gas production techniques. Iranian Journal of Animal Science Research 7;(3): 257-266.
Saylor BA, Min D and  Bradford BJ, 2021. Effects of cultivar and harvest days after planting on dry matter yield and nutritive value of teff. Journal of Animal Science and Technology 63;(3): 510-520‏
Shand WJ, Ørskov ER and Morrice AF, 1988. Rumen degradation of straw. Botanical fraction and degradability of different varieties of oat and wheat straw. Animal Production 47:378-392.
Shanmugam H, Raghavan V, Rajagopal R, Goyette B, Lyu L, Zhou S and An C, 2024. Evaluating sustainable practices for managing residue derived from wheat straw. Bioengineering 11;(6), 554.‏
Stern MD, Bach A and Calsamiglia S, 2001. Alternative Techniques for Measuring Nutrient Digestion in ruminants. Journal of Animal Science 75: 2256-2276.
Tolera A, Berg T and Sundstøl F, 1999. The effect of variety on maize grain and crop residue yield and nutritive value of the stover. Animal Feed Science and Technology 79: 165–177.
Torbatinejad NM, 1996. Determination of nutritional value of wheat straw, barley straw, rice straw, rice husk, tea waste and alfalfa by chemical and digestion method before and after ammoniating, Master's thesis, National Institute of Animal Husbandry Research 59-123.
Truong NB and Thu NV, 2022. Effect of dietary levels of neutral detergent fiber on feed intake, nutrient digestibility, rumen parameters and nitrogen retention of beef cattle. Advances in Animal and Veterinary Sciences 10;(2): 316-322.‏
Tuah AK, Lufadeju E and Ørskov ER, 1986. Rumen degradation of straw Untreated and ammonia-treated straw. Animal Production 43: 261-269.
Yu CW, Chen YS, Cheng YH, Cheng YS, Yang CM and  Chang CT, 2010. Effects of fumarate on ruminal ammonia accumulation and fiber digestion in vitro and nutrient utilization in dairy does. Journal of Dairy Science 93;(2): 701-710.‏
Van Soest PJ, Robertson JB and Lewis BA, 1991. Methods of dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber and non-starch polysaccharide in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science 74: 3583-3597.
Van Soest PJ, 1994. Nutritional ecology of the ruminant (2nd Ed.). Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY.