Effect of feeding frequency on feeding behavior, milk yield, and composition in Brown Swiss dairy cows

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

Abstract

Introduction: In feeding of dairy cows, well balanced diet and the proper amount of dietary fiber and particle sizeare necessary. Also, management of feed and feed intake is very important. On the other hand, increasing the intake of dry matter in lactating cows during early lactation is vital for improving milk production, animal health, and physical condition (Grant and Albright, 1995). One of the factors affecting animal health, is the physical properties of the feed, which has a strong relationship with the health of the digestive tract and animal feeding behaviors. Many researches have shown that cows tend to consume fine-grained components of their diet and makes selective consumption against larger components of the diet, while coarse components of the diet and long pieces are essential for animal health, because it increases rumination and chewing activity in animals (Stone, 2004). This experiment was carried out to evaluate effect of feeding frequency on feeding behavior, milk yield, and composition in dairy cows.
Material and methods: Twenty Brown Swiss dairy cows (average milk yield of 26.56 ± 5.2 Kg/d and 44.95 days in milk) were used in a completely random design for two periods. Two experimental treatments were applied. The experimental treatments were: 1- delivery of feed twice per day at 08:00 am and 8:00 pm and 2- delivery of feed three times per day at 08:00, 16:00 and 24:00. Each experimental period consisted of 21 days adaptability and 4 days recording of feeding behavior, milk yield, and composition. For all cows, eating activity and ruminating were recorded by visual method within 48 hours (first and second days during four-day sampling) at intervals of five minutes. Total chewing activity was calculated from the total time spent eating and ruminating. Sleep duration was measured at intervals of 10 minutes. Distribution of particle size was determined through PSPS (Penn State Particle Seprator). Approximate analysis of samples was undertaken by AOAC (2005). Neutral detergent fiber and acid detergent fiber were determined by the method of Van Soest (1991). Milk production was recorded on the third and fourth days of two sampling periods. Samples were taken at these days used to determine fat, protein, lactose, fat-free solids and urea by the means of milko scan system. Measurement of milk casein nitrogen, non-casein nitrogen, non-protein nitrogen of milk and true protein of milk were calculated by Raveland method (1938).
Results and discussion: The results of this experiment showed that increasing the feeding frequency from two to three times a day increased the duration of eating, ruminating, chewing activity. Eating activity (minute / day) was significantly affected by experimental treatments (p < 0.05). Delivery of feed three times a day increased the amount of time consumed for feeding. The increase in feed intake significantly increased the activity of chewing (734 vs. 771 minutes per day) (p < 0.05). The most important feed-related factor affecting the activity of chewing is the physical structure and the chemical nature of the feed (Frooghi, 2005). With increasing feeding frequency, the activity of ruminant in standing position was reduced by approximately 10 minutes (p < 0.05). This means that fewer frequency of feeding increased the level of ruminant activity in the standing position (Phillips and Rind, 2001). Also, the ruminant activity in the resting position was affected by experimental treatments and increased with increasing in feed delivery per day (P <0.0001). The results of this experiment showed that with increasing feed intake from two to three times a day, the selective consumption of feed components decreased and the consumption of NDF and long particles also increased (p < 0.05). Therefore, increasing feeding has a more favorable effect on animal performance and prevents the separation of feed components (Jeziersky and Podluzny, 1984). The feeding frequency had a significant effect on the percentage of selection on screen 1.18 mm (short pieces) (p < 0.05). This means that with increasing feed frequency, consumption from this screen was decreased. However, increasing feed intake, milk production was non significantly increased by 900 g/day. Also, increasing in the frequency of feed provision increased percent of protein, casein N and true protein of milk. However, increasing in the frequency of feed provision significantly decreased percent of milk urea (p < 0.05). Perhaps the reason for the increase in milk protein with increasing feeding frequency is attributed to an increase in eating time and an increase in energy consumption in the form of concentrate or forage (Phillips and Rind, 2001). Feeding frequency had no significant effect on the percentage of milk solids- non- fat.
Conclusion: The results of this study showed that increasing feeding frequency can improve rumination and chewing activity and decrease the selective consumption of feed components. As the results of previous experiments showed, low feed intake increases competition between cows and also causes cows to wait for access to the feeder. So, excessive standing time can increase the risk of acidosis and laminits and reduce animal economic useful life.

Albright JL, 1987. Dairy animal welfare: current and needed research. Journal of Dairy Science 70:2711.
Albright JL, 1993. Feeding behavior in dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 76:485.
AOAC, 1990. Official methods of analysis of the association of official analytical chemists.15th ed.Washington, DC. USA.
Aslami nejad A and Hasani S, 1993. Applied nutrition of dairy cows. Mashhad University Press jihad.
Baker F.H, 1981. Scientific aspects of the welfare of food animals. Counce. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology. Rep. No. 91, lowa State Univ, Ames.
Bauman DE and Curri WB, 1980. Partitioning of nutrients during pregnancy and lactation. A review of mechanisms involving homeostasis and homeorhesis. Journal of Dairy Science 63:1514.
Beauchemin KA, Farr BI, Rode LM and Schaalje GB, 1994. Effects of alfalfa silage chop length and supplementary long hay on chewing and milk production of dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 77:1326-1339.
Beauchemin, KA, Yangand WZ and Rode LM, 2003. Effect of particle size of alfa alfa-based dairy cow diets on chewing activity, ruminal fermentation and milk production. Journal of Dairy Science 86:630-643.
DeVries TJ, Von Keyserlingk MAG and Beauchemin KA, 2005. Frequency of feed delivery affects the behavior of lactating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 88:3553-3562. 
Fregonesi JA, Tucker CB, Weary DM, Flower FC and Vittie T, 2004. Effectof rubber flooring in front of the feed bunk on the behavior of dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 87:1203-1207. 
French N and Kennely JJ, 1990. Effects of feeding frequency on ruminal parameters, plasma insulin, milk yield and milk composition in Holstein cows. Journal of Dairy Science 73:1857-1863.
Friend TH and Polan CE, 1974. Social rank, feeding behavior and free stall utilization by dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 57:1214-1220.
Frooghi A, 2005. Effects of cottonseed processed, protected methionine and lysine on milk production and composition of Holstein dairy cows. PhD thesis, University of Mashhad.
Grant RJ, Colenbrander VF and Mertens DR, 1990. Milk fat depression in dairy cows: role of particle size of alfalfa hay. Journal of Dairy Science 73:1823-1833.
Grant, RJ and Albright JL, 1995. Feeding behavior and management factors during the transition period in dairy cattle. Journal of Animal Science 73:2791-2803.
Grant R, 2007.Taking advantage of natural behavior improves dairy cow performance. Western Dairy Management Conference.  
Grant RJ and Albright JL, 2000. Feeding behavior. Walling ford Oxon United Kingdom.
Greenough PR and Vermunt JJ, 1991. Evaluation of subclinical laminitis in a dairy herd and observations on associated nutritional and management factors. Veterinary Research 128:11-17.
Huzzy JM, De Vries TJ, Valois P and von Keyserlink MAG, 2006. Stocking density and feed barrier design effect the feeding and social behavior of dairy cattle. Journal of DairyScience 89:126-133.
Jeziersky TA and Podluzny M, 1984. A quantitative analysis of social behavior of different crossbreds of dairy cattle kept in loose housing and its relation to productivity. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 13:31-40.
Krause KM and Oetzel G, 2006. Understanding and preventing subacute ruminal acidosis in dairy herds: A review, Journal of Animal Feed Science and Technology 126:215-236.
Lammers BP, Buckmaster DR and Heinrichs AJ, 1996. A simple method for the analysis of particle sizes of forage and total mixed rations. Journal of DairyScience 79:922-928.
Leonardi CK, Shinnersand J, Armentano LE, 2005. Effect of different dietary geometric mean particle length and particle size distribution of oat silage on feeding behavior and productive performance of daily cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 88:698-710.
Leonardi C and Armentano LE, 2003. Effect of quantity, quality and length of alfaalfa hay on selective consumption by dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 86:557-564.
Miller K and Wood-Gush DGM, 1991. Some effect of housing on the social behavior of dairy cows. Animal Production Science 55:271-276.
National Research Council. 2001. Nutrient Requirements of Dairy Cattle. 7th ed. National Academy Press. Washington, DC.
Nocek JE and Braund DG, 1985. Effect of feeding frequency on diurnal dry matter and water consumption, liquid dilution rate and milk yield in first lactation. Journal of Dairy Science 68:2238-2247.
Olofsson J, 1990. Competition for total mixed diets fed for ad libitum intake using one or four cows per feeding station. Journal of Dairy Science 82:69-79.
Phillips CJC and Rind MI, 2001. The effects of frequency of feeding total mixed ration on the production and behavior of dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 84:1979-1987.
Rawland SJ, 1938. The determination of the nitrogen distribution in milk. Journal of Dairy Science 9: 42.
SAS Institute Inc, 1996. Statistical Analysis System (SAS) User's Guide, SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA.
Shabi Z, Murphy MR and Moallem U, 2005. Within-day feeding behavior of lactating dairy cows measured using a real-time control system. Journal of Dairy Science 88:1848-1854.
Shamsaei M, 2010. The Effect of the Physical Form of Totall mixed rations on Performance and Nutrition Behaviors in Lactating Cows. Master's thesis, University of Birjand. (In Persian)
Sharifi M, 2008. Effect of silage and forage on dietary intake, rumen parameters and milk production in lactating Holstein cows. Third National Animal Sciences Congress, October 15-16, Mashhad, Iran. (In Persian)
Stone WC, 2004. Nutritional approaches to minimize subacute ruminal acidosis and laminitis in dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 87:E13-E26. 
Van Soest PJ, Robertson JB and Lewis BA, 1991. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber and non starch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science 74: 3583 –3597. 
Welch JG, 1982. Rumination, particle size and passage from the rumen. Journal of Animal Science 54:885-894.