تاثیر واکسیناسیون بیماری تب‌برفکی بر پارامتر‌های کیفی و کمی مایع منی گاو‌ نژاد هلشتاین

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 مرکز تولید مواد ژنتیکی گاو های شیری و گوشتی ایران

2 مرکز تولید مواد ژنتیک گاوهای شیری و گوشتی ایران

چکیده

زمینه مطالعاتی: مطالعه حاضر به بررسی اثر واکسن تب‌برفکی بر ویژگی‌های مایع منی 20 راس گاو نر از نژاد هلشتاین با سن 3 تا 5 سال که در مرکز تولید مواد ژنتیکی شرکت نهاده های دامی جاهد نگهداری می‌شد می‌پردازد. هدف: هدف از طراحی این مطالعه انجام درمان‌های حمایتی و استراحت جنسی در صورت مشاهده اثر منفی واکسن بر کیفیت مایع منی در دوره پس از تزریق واکسن می باشد. روش کار: زمان انجام این تحقیق از آبان ماه سال 1397 تا فروردین سا‌ل 1398 بود و گاو‌هایی که اسپرم آن‌ها در این تحقیق مورد ارزیابی قرار گرفته است دارای تغذیه و مدیریت پرورشی یکسان بودند. به طور کلی تعداد 571 پرش در بازه زمانی دو هفته قبل، دو هفته اول و دو هفته دوم بعد از تزریق واکسن تب‌برفکی جمع‌آوری گردید. واکسن مورد استفاده واکسن تب‌برفکی نوع کشته چند ظرفیتی ساخت موسسه تحقیقات واکسن و سرم‌سازی رازی می‌باشد. هر انزال از نظر پارامترهای حجم انزال، غلظت، انواع تحرک نمونه اسپرم تازه و پس از انجماد و انکوباسیون و همچنین یکپارچگی غشای پلاسمایی مورد ارزیابی قرار گرفت. برای آنالیز آماری نتایج حاصل، از نرم‌افزار آماری SPSS، از روش وان وی آنووا استفاده شد و p<0.05 به عنوان سطح معنی‌داری داده‌ها در نظر گرفته شد. نتایج: نتایج بدست آمده نشان داد که واکسیناسیون تاثیر معنی‌داری (P<0.05) بر تحرک پیشرونده، آرام، لوکال و درصد اسپرم‌های بی‌تحرک پس از انجماد و انکوباسیون در هر دو بازه زمانی پس از تزریق دارد. در حالیکه تاثیری بر حجم ، غلظت، تحرک پیشرونده و درصد اسپرم‌های بی‌تحرک نمونه‌های تازه ندارد(P>0.05) . نتیجه گیری نهایی: مشاهدات نشان می دهند که واکسیناسیون باعث تغییر در کیفیت مایع منی گاوهای نژاد هلشتاین می شود.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Effect of foot and mouth disease vaccination on various semen characteristic in Holstein bulls

نویسندگان [English]

  • efat foroughi 1
  • maryam rahbar 1
  • seyedeh Boshra moosavi 2
  • Mohammad Rasoul Khoshniyat 1
1 NDJ AI CENTER
2 NDJ AI Center
چکیده [English]

Introduction: Many outbreaks of foot and mouth disease (FMD), an endemic disease of artiodactyl ruminants, occur all over the country every year. FMD is one of the diseases that cause a lot of economic damage to animals and is one of the main obstacles in ensuring health and production of livestock. Preventing the introduction of the disease into a country by controlling the imports of meats and meat products and other sources which might transmit the virus or use of vaccination are two major alternatives in respect to preventing and controlling FMD (Carpenter and Thieme, 1979). Vaccination, with currently available and tested vaccine must be undertaken at least three times annually to maintain immunity. The semen quality may be affected by vaccination due to vaccine stress and anaphylactic shock (Murugavel et al. 1997). The present investigation was carried out to study the effect of FMD vaccination on seminal traits of Holstein bulls.
Material and methods: Twenty Holstein bulls between three and five years old maintained at Nahadehaye Dami Jahed Artificial Insemination center were used in present study, which were housed in individual pens under identical feeding and management regimes. FMD vaccine polyvalent (inactivated, containing virus types O2016, A13, A15 and Asia1 strains) produced by Razi vaccine and serum research Institute was administered for vaccination purpose at 5 ml by SC injection route. Semen samples were collected by artificial vagina technique. Appropriate sexual preparation with two false mount on dummy cow was followed. A total of 571 semen ejaculates were collected at 15 days before, 15 days after and 15-30 days after FMD vaccination during autumn of 2018 and spring of 2019. Seminal traits like fresh and post thaw sperm motility, motility after incubation test, sperm concentration, semen volume and HOS test were evaluated. The ejaculate volume was measured in the divided semen collection tube in milliliters. The concentration of spermatozoa was calculated by photometer. Motility of spermatozoa was analyzed by Computer-assisted sperm analysis (CASA). The integrity of sperm membrane was evaluated using the hypo-osmotic swelling test (HOST). Extended semen was filled in medium straws and were frozen by programmable freezing device. Recorded data were analyzed using SPSS, oneway ANOVA. The differences at P<0.05 were considered to be statistically significant.
Results and discussion: However, the available reports on the effect of such vaccination on semen quality are conflicting, Vaccination is one of the major anaphylactic stress factors that affect the semen quality (Gahlot and Kohli, 1981; Venkatareddy et al. 1991 and Murugavel et al. 1997).
In this study There was no significant (P>0.05) effect of vaccination on the semen volume in Holstein bulls, but a slightly increasing trend was observed. The secondary activities of accessory sex glands remain unaffected following vaccination (Radhakrishnan et al. 1975). So, this can be considered as a possible cause for no change in the ejaculate volume. However, Venkatareddy et al. (1991) in Onqole, Jersey and Ongole × Jersey breeds reported an increase in the volume of semen. Significant decrease in sperm concentration following vaccination was observed by Venkataswamy and Rao (1970); Venkatareddy et al. (1991) and Singh et al. (2003). On the contrary, Kammar and Gnagadhar (1998) reported no adverse effect of vaccination on sperm concentration during post vaccination period, and in the current study there is no evidence of reduction in sperm concentration (p>0.05). The decreased sperm concentration may be due to the adverse effects of therapeutic agents on germinal cells resulting into increase in dead spermatozoa, which are absorbed by leucocytes through phagocytosis (Mann and Mann 1981). The negative effects of vaccination may be due to the adverse effects produced by therapeutic agents or degenerative changes in germinal epithelium. The increased resorption of abnormal spermatozoa leads to reduction in epididymal sperm reserves (Rao et al. 1980), thereby decreasing concentration. The motility of sperm cell develops during their passage through epididymis (Olson et al. 2002). However, vaccination transitory rise in body temperature as well as testes temperature causes derangement in spermatogenesis and epididymal function, and this leads to vaccination mediated declined sperm motility (Arthur 1989). When testicular temperature increases, metabolism increases at a greater rate than blood flow and hence the testes become hypoxic. Therefore, the testes are very susceptible to temperature increases due to endogenous or exogenous factors (e.g. fever, high ambient temperature). As testicular temperature increases, the proportion of defective spermatozoa increases; recovery is dependent upon the nature and duration of the thermal insult (Setchell 1978). Pankaj et al. (2007) reported significant reduction in the mass activity and motility of buffalo bull semen after vaccination. In this study a non-significant effect on initial progressive motility with decreasing trend was observed which is in agreement with observation of Gupta et al. (2017). Our results are in agreement with the findings of Bhakat et al. (2010) who reported a significant decline in post thaw motility during post vaccination. To be specific, there was a significant decrease in frozen semen samples progressive and slow motility, rate of plasma membrane integrity and significant increase in immotile spermatozoa in our study(p<0.05). Contrary to this Mangurkar et al. (2000) observed no significant effect on post freezing motility. Both physiological and structural status of sperm get severely affected during cryopreservation (Bailey et al. 2003). The chemical, osmotic, thermal and mechanical stresses during extension, cooling, freezing and thawing result in cryoinjuries of varying degree to the spermatozoa (Farooq et al. 2013). The significant variation in post thaw motility and motility after incubation test can be attributed to the effect of thermal stress developed following vaccination (Gupta et al. 2017).
Conclusion: The observations showed that vaccination changes the seminal characteristics of Holstein bulls. Thus, it is suggested that AI Centers consider sexual rest and prescribe supportive treatment in order to improve semen characteristics after vaccination.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • FMD vaccination"
  • " Holstein"
  • " Semen quality
Anderson J, 2001. The semen of animals and its use for artificial insemination. Greenworld publishers, Lucknow, India, First Ind, Reprint.
Bailey J, Morrie A and Cormier N, 2003. Semen cryopreservation, success and persistence in farm species.  Canadian Journal of Animal Science 83: 393-401.
Barth AD and Oko RJ, 1989. Abnormal morphology of bovine spermatozoa, Iowa state university press, Ames.
Bhakat M, Mohanty TK, Gupta AK, Chakravarty AK, Singh P and Abdullah M, 2015. Effect of HS and BQ vaccination on semen quality parameters of Murrah buffalo bulls. Journal of Infection and Molecular Biology 3(1): 24-27.
Bhakat M, Mohanty TK, Gupta AK, Raina VS and Brahma B, 2010. Effect of FMD vaccination on semen quality parameters in Karan Fries and Murrah buffalo bulls. Tropical Animal Health and Production 42: 1363-1366.
Bhakat M, Mohanty TK, Gupta AK, Raina VS, Mondal G and Khan HM, 2008. Effect of FMD vaccination on various semen characteristics of Sahiwal bulls, Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Science 45: 327-332.
Bhakat M, Mohanty TK, Raina VS, Gupta AK and Brahma B, 2011. Effect of TRIOVAC vaccination on semen quality parameters in Karan Fries and Murrah buffalo bulls. Indian Veterinary Journal 88(3): 33-34.
Burfening PJ and Ulberg LC, 1968. Embryonic survival subsequent to ulture of rabbit spermatozoa at 38DC and 40DC. Journal of reproduction and fertility 15: 87-92.
Carpenter TE and Thieme A, 1979. A simulation approach to measuring the economic effects of foot-and-mouth disease in beef and dairy cattle. Pp. 511-516. Proceedings of the 2nd international symposium on veterinary epidemiology and economics. May, Canberra, Australia.
Cooper TG, Teung CH, Jones R, Orgebin-Crist MC and Robaire B, 2002. Rebuttal of a role for the epididymis in sperm quality control by phagocytosis of defective sperm. Journal of Cell Science 115:5-7.
Farooq U, Ijaz A, Ahmad N, Rehman H and Zaneb H, 2013. Investigations on semen quality and freezability of Cholistani breeding bulls - A preliminary study from Cholistan desert of Pakistan. Journal of Animal and Plant Science 23(2): 359-363.
Gahlot PS, Bishnoi BL and Kohli TS, 1990. Semen studies during vaccination stress in jersey bulls. Indian Journal of Animal Reproduction 11(2): 109-110.
Gahlot PS and Kohli TS, 1981. Effect of Rinderpest vaccination (freeze dried) on the semen quality of jersey bulls maintained in the arid zone. Indian Veterinary Journal 58: 1001-1002.
Grubman MJ and Baxt B, 2004. Foot-and-mouth disease. Clinical Microbiology Reviews 17: 465-493.
Gupta MD, Rathi G, Sontakke SH, Vinod S, Mushtaque M, Kadam H, Dash S and Khadse JR, 2017. Effect of foot and mouth disease vaccination on seminal traits in pure Holstein Friesian bulls. Indian Journal of Animal Science B-3445: 1-4.
Jayendran RS, Van Der Ven HH, Perez-Pelaez M, Crabo BG and Zaneveld LJD, 1984. Development of an assay to assess the functional integrity of the human sperm membrane and its relationship to other semen characteristics. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility 70: 219-228.
Kammar NF and Gangadhar KS, 1998. Effect of foot-and-mouth vaccination on reaction time and some seminal characteristics in Surti bulls. Indian Journal of Animal Reproduction 19(2): 149-150.
Mangurkar BR, Phadnis YP and Bhosrekar MR, 2000. Effect of Foot and mouth disease vaccination on semen characteristics of exotic and cross-breed bulls, Indian Journal of Animal Reproduction 21: 135-137.
Mann T and Mann CL, 1981. Male Reproductive Funtion and Semen. Springer-Verlag Berlin. Heidelberg, New York, USA.
Mathur AK, Tyagi SK, Mandal DK and Singh SP, 2003. Effect of multiple vaccinations on the semen quality of Frieswal bulls. Indian Journal of Animal Science 73(8): 864-866.
Moulikrishan K and Ramamohan Rao, 1986. Epididymal dysfunction in buffalo bulls. Indian Veterinary Journal 63: 1013-1016.
Murugavel K, Veerapandian C and Subramanian A, 1997. Effect of black quarter vaccination on semen quality in Murrah bulls. Indian Journal of Animal Science 67: 597-598.
Olson GE, NagDas SK and Winfrey VP, 2002. Structural differentiation of spermatozoa during post-testicular maturation. Pp 371-387. In: Robaire B, Hinton BT. (eds). The Epididymis: From Molecules to Clinical Practice. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York.
Pankaj PK, Raina VS, Roy B, Mohanty TK and Mishra A, 2007. Studies on effect of vaccination on seminal characteristics of riverine buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis), Buffalo Bulletin 26: 91-103.
Perumal P, Khate K and Rajkhowa C, 2013. Effect of foot and mouth disease vaccination on seminal and biochemical profiles of Mithun (Bosfrontalis) semen. Asian Pacific Journal of Reproduction 2: 178-184.
Rao AR, 1976. Sperm akinesia in a hollikar bull. Indian Veterinary Journal 53: 414-418.
Rao AR, Bane A and Gustafasson BK, 1980. Changes in the morphology of spermatozoa during their passage through the genital tract in dairy bulls with normal and impaired spermatogenesis. Theriogenology 14(1): 10-12.
Rao TKS, Kumar B, Sharma VK, Sriranga KR, Baishya A, Bhakat M, Mohanty TK, 2018. Effect of vaccination on performance of dairy animals with special reference to bulls. Theriogenology Insight 7(3): 185-197.
Rao VJ and Venkataswami V, 1974. Histo-pathology of testicular tissue of crossbred bulls in Foot and Mouth disease vaccination. II. Indian Veterinary Journal 48: 1101-1103.
Radhakrishnan R, Venkataswami V and Pattabiraman SR, 1975. Further report on the effect of protective vaccination on semen quality of breeding bulls. Indian Veterinary Journal 52: 620-625.
Revell SG and Mrode RA, 1994. An osmotic resistance test for bovine semen. Animal Reproduction Science 36(1–2): 77-86.
Roberts SJ, 1986. Veterinary Obstetrics and Genital Diseases. Wood stock, Vermount.
Salisbury GW, Vandemark NL and Lodge JR, 1978. Physiology of reproduction and Artificial Insemination of cattle. p. 574. Freeman W.H. (ed). San Francisco.
Saxena VB and Tripathi SS, 1977. Effect of foot and mouth disease vaccination on semen quantity, quality and preservability in Jersey bulls. Indian Veterinary Journal 54: 959-964.
Setchell BP, 1978. The scrotum and thermoregulation. pp. 90-108. In: Setchell B.P. (ed). The mammalian testis. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Setchell BP, Voglmayr JK and Hinks NT, 1971. The effect of local eating on the flow and composition of rete testis fluid in the conscious ram. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility 24: 81-89.
Singh R, Verma HK and Kumar S, 2003. Effect of the foot and mouth disease vaccination on the semen quality of buffalo bulls. Indian Journal of Animal Science 73: 1319-1323.
Tripathi SS and Saxena VB, 1976. A note on the foot-and-mouth vaccination stress on quantity, quality and preservability of semen of Murrah buffalo bulls. Indian journal of animal science 46: 44-47.
Venkatareddy J, Venkatamunichetty A, Ramachandran SV and Sreeraman, 1991. Effect of foot and mouth disease vaccination on semen quality. Indian Journal of Animal Production 12: 13-14.
Venkataswami V, Pattabiraman D and Sunderavadanam K, 1972. Effect of vaccination on spermatozoa resistance and on their metabolic activity. Indian Veterinary Journal 49: 1012-1016.
Venkataswami V and Rao VJ, 1970. Preliminary report on the effect of foot and mouth disease vaccination on semen quality of crossbred bulls-1. Indian Veterinary Journal 47: 23-29.
Vogler CJ, Bame JH, DeJamette JM, McGilliard ML, and Saackea RG, 1993. Characteristics of ejaculated spermatozoa in the bovine. Theriogenology 40:1207-l 219.
Waites GMH and Setchell BP, 1990. Physiology of the mammalian testis. Pp.1-105. Marshall’s Physiology of Reproduction in the Male. Lamming G E. (ed). Churchill Livingstone, Edinburg.