اثرات محدودیت کمی خوراک بر عملکرد، فراسنجه‌های خونی، جمعیت میکروبی دستگاه گوارش و ترکیب شیمیایی فضولات جوجه‌های گوشتی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 گروه علوم دامی، دانشگاه علوم کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی خوزستان

2 گروه علوم دامی، دانشکده علوم دامی و صنایع غذایی، دانشگاه علوم کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی خوزستان

3 مرکز تحقیقات و آموزش کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی گلستان

4 شرکت سلامت دان دزفول

چکیده

زمینه مطالعاتی: محدودیت غذایی سبب بروز کاهش آسیت، عارضه مرگ ناگهانی، اختلالات اسکلتی، تلفات و چربی حفره‌ی شکمی ولاشه می‌شود. هدف: این تحقیق به منظور بررسی اثرات محدودیت کمی خوراک بر عملکرد، فراسنجه های خونی، جمعیت میکروبی دستگاه گوارش و خصوصیات فضولات جوجه‌های گوشتی انجام شد. روش کار: آزمایش در قالب طرح کاملا تصادفی با تعداد 300 قطعه جوجه گوشتی سویه راس 308 از سن 11 تا 35 روزگی در 5 تیمار، 5 تکرار و 12 قطعه در هر تکرار انجام گرفت. تیمارهای آزمایشی شامل 1) جیره پایه (بر اساس ذرت- سویا)، 2) دسترسی خوراک به میزان 95 درصد خوراک شاهد، 3) دسترسی خوراک به میزان 90 درصد خوراک شاهد، 4) دسترسی خوراک به میزان 85 درصد خوراک شاهد و 5) دسترسی خوراک به میزان 80 درصد خوراک شاهد بودند. فلورمیکروبی سکوم در 35 روزگی و آنالیز لاشه در 42 روزگی بررسی شد. نتایج: محدودیت کمی خوراک مصرف خوراک و افزایش وزن بدن را کاهش داد (05/0>P). خصوصیات لاشه، ضریب تبدیل خوراک و خصوصیات فضولات دفعی تحت تأثیر محدودیت خوراک قرار نگرفتند (05/0<P). همچنین اعمال محدودیت در سطوح 85 و 80 درصد، باعث کاهش معنی‌دار دفع پروتئین از طریق فضولات در مقایسه با تیمار شاهد شد (05/0>P). محدودیت خوراک در سطح 80 درصد، باعث افزایش معنی‌دار تعداد باکتری‌های لاکتوباسیلوس و کاهش معنی‌دار باکتری‌های ای‌کولای شد (05/0>P). محدودیت خوراک سبب کاهش تری‌گلیسرید و LDL خون شد (05/0>P). نتیجه‌گیری نهایی: اگر چه اعمال محدودیت خوراک تا سطح 80 درصد، سبب کاهش مصرف خوراک و اضافه وزن جوجه های گوشتی در کل دوره پرورش شد اما این محدودیت سبب بهبود فلور میکروبی دستگاه گوارش، کاهش فراسنجه‌های لیپیدی خون و کاهش دفع پروتئین شد.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Investigation the effects of quantitative feed restriction on performances, blood parameters, gut microflora and chemical composition of excreta of broiler chickens

نویسندگان [English]

  • Ferdowse Ghalavand 1
  • Somayyeh Salari 2
  • Ahmad Tatar 3
  • Mohammadreza Ghorbani 2
  • Kazem Moosavi Fakhr 4
1 Animal Science Department, Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University of Khuzestan
2 Department of Animal Science, Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University of Khuzestan
3 Golestan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center
4 Executive of Salamatdan Dezful Company
چکیده [English]

Introduction: Changes in the pattern of animal protein consumption and a greater tendency to consume chicken in the last decade has greatly increased the demand for this product. Considering that 70% of the cost of poultry production is related to nutrition, so, it can be concluded that optimal nutrition is the most important way to reduce production costs in this industry (Abdollahi et al. 2013). Advances in broiler nutrition and breeding have increased growth rate and reduced breeding period over the past few decades. At present, broilers reach slaughter weight at the age of 42 days. Unfortunately, this high growth rate leads to problems such as metabolic disorders (sudden death Syndrome, skeletal disorders and ascites), increased mortality, and abdominal, and carcass fat (Khajali et al. 2007). Slowing down the growth rate by using dietary restrictions will greatly prevent these problems. At the same time, low growth is not economical and it is necessary to compensate for the backward growth of chickens due to food restrictions. Researchers have stated that the main goal of research on dietary restriction in broilers is to improve feed efficiency and reduce carcass and abdominal fat (Zhan et al. 2007). Depriving birds, especially broilers, of rapid growth from full access to the nutrients needed for normal growth is called feed restriction, which is classified into two categories: quantitative and qualitative. The response to feed restriction depends on the duration of the feed restriction (Khetani et al. 2009). In quantitative or physical feed restrictions, the consumption of birds or animals is limited. The practical application of physical feed restriction is not easy due to the problems of regular weighing of poultry and calculating daily feed intake (Zulkifli et al. 2000). Quality restriction is another method of applying feed restriction that aims to use diets with low energy and protein levels (Fanooci and Torki 2010). Urdaneta-Rincon and Lesson (2002) y applying 85, 90 and 95% quantitative feed restriction in male broilers at 5 to 42 days of age, they showed that the application of dietary restriction led to a significant difference in weight at 42 days of age and also a significant reduction in mortality. Bautzen et al (2003) in an experiment on broiler sex mixture and the application of quantitative feed restrictions at the ages of 6 to 16 days and 80% of the previous day's consumption of the control treatment, showed that performance was affected in the early weeks, but the restricted treatments at the age of 42 One day, they achieved the desired compensatory growth and no difference with the control group. Therefore, according to the reports on the use of feed restriction in reducing metabolic diseases and losses, it seems necessary to study feed restriction in broilers.
Material and methods: In order to evaluate the effects of quantitative feed restriction, 300 one-day-old Ross broilers were each in a completely randomized design with five treatments, five replications and 12 pieces per replication for 42 days. The birds were fed ad-libitum up to 10 days then they were restricted from 11 to 35 days and they were fed ad-libitum up from 36 to 42 of age. Experimental treatments include: (1) Corn- soybean meal – based diet as a control group (no feed restrictions), (2) feed access to 95% control group, (3) feed access to 90% control group, (4) feed access to 85% control group (5) feed access to 80% control group. Diets were prepared according to the maintenance guidelines of Ross 308 strain. At 42 days of age, one chick from each pen was randomly selected and slaughtered, and the carcass traits such as breast, thigh, gizzard, liver, abdominal fat and carcass yield were determined. On day 35 of the breeding period, one chick from each experimental unit was randomly selected and slaughtered. The cecum of the birds was isolated and examined for the microbial population of Lactobacillus, Coliform and E. coli in the laboratory. Blood samples were also collected and then, centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 10 minutes and transferred to the laboratory to determine blood parameters (Cholesterol, Triglyceride, HDL and LDL). On day 35 of the experiment, some samples were collected and transferred to the laboratory to determine the percentage of dry matter, moisture, ash and volatile solids. To sample the waste, two hours before sampling, it was placed on the bed of each plastic pen and the waste were collected from five points of each pen. Experimental data were statistically analyzed in a completely randomized design using GLM procedure by software (SAS 2004) and the means were compared by Duncan's multiple range test at 5% probability level.
Results and discussion: The results showed that feed restriction decreased feed intake and body weight gain comparted with the control group (P<0.05). Carcass characteristics, FCR and feces characteristics were not affected by Feed restriction (P>0.05). Also, feed restriction at the levels of 85% and 80% significantly decreased protein excretion in comparison with the control group (P<0.05). Feed restriction at the level of 80%, increased cecal populations of Lactobacillus spp. While decreased cecal populations of E. coli (P<0.05). Feed restriction decreased blood triglyceride and increased blood LDL (P<0.05). Quantitative feed restriction clearly affected body weight gain and feed intake of birds. The degree of change in these parameters depended on the level of feed restriction used. There was a reduction in body weight gain at 42 d for chicks restricted to 95, 90, and 85%, of ad libitum feed intake, relative to the previous day’s intake of the control birds. Such a reduction in body weight is in accordance with results from Khantaprab et al. (1997), Roth et al. (1993), and Santoso et al. (1993a). Results suggest that the growth rate of broiler chickens is related to feed intake, which supports the statement that improvement in body weight of birds is highly correlated to feed consumption (O’Sullivan et al, 1992).
Conclusion: Overall the results showed that although feed restriction up to 80%, decreased feed intake and body weight gain of broiler chickens at the total period of experiment, but this restriction improved microbial population of cecum, decreased blood LDL and protein excretion.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Broiler chick
  • Carcass
  • Feed restriction
  • Gut microflora
Abdollahi MR, Ravindran V and Svihus B, 2013. Pelleting of broiler diets: an overview with emphasis on pellet quality and nutritional value. Animal Feed Science and Technology 179: 1-23.
Antongiovanni M, Buccioni A, Francesco P, Leeson S, Minieri S, Martini A and Cecchi R, 2007. Butyric acid glycerides in the diet of broiler chickens: effects on gut histology and carcass composition. International Journal of Animal Science 6: 19-25.
Balog JM, Anthony NB, Cooper MA, Kidd BD, Huff GR, Huff WE and Rath NC 2000. Ascites syndrome and related pathologies in feed restricted broilers raised in a hypobaric chamber. Poultry Science 79: 318–323.
Barreto MSR, Menten JFM, Racanicci AMC, Pereira PWZ and Rizzo PV, 2008. Plant Extracts used as Growth Promoters in Broilers. Poultry Science 10 : 109 - 115.
Bautzen FM, Ribeiro AML, Vieira MM, Kessler AM, Dadalt JC and Della MP, 2013. Early feed restriction in broilers. I-Performance, body fraction weights and meat quality. Journal of Applied Poultry Research 22: 251-25.
Bolukbasi SC, Sinah-Aktasand M and Guzel M, 2005. The effect of feed regimen on Ascites induced by cold temperatures and growth performance in male broilers. International Journal of Poultry Science 4: 326-329.
Demir E, Sarica, S, Sekeroglu A, Ozcan MA and Seker Y, 2004. Effects of early and late feed restriction or feed withdrawal on growth performance, ascites and blood constituents of broiler chickens. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section A-Animal Science 54: 152-158.‏
Fanooci M and Torki M, 2010. Effects of qualitative dietary restriction on performance, carcass characteristics, white blood cell count and humoral immune response of broiler chicks. Poultry Science 4: 277-282.
Ferket PR, Parks CW and Grimes JL, 2002. Benefits of dietary antibiotic and mannanoligosaccharide supplementation for poultry. In Multi-State Poultry Meeting (Vol. 14). Indianopolis: University of Illinois.
‏ Gabriel I, Mallet S, Leconte M., Travel A and Lalles JP, 2008. Effect of whole wheat feeding on the development of the digestive tract of broiler chickens. Animal Feed Science and Technology 142:144-162.
Ghazanfari S, Kermanshahi H, Nassiry MR, Golian A, Moussavi ARH and Salehi A, 2010. Effect of feed restriction and different energy and protein levels of the diet on growth performanceand growth hormone in broiler chickens. Journal Biology Science 10: 25–30.
Guban J, Korver DR, Allison GE, Tannock GW (2006) Relationship of dietary antimicrobial drug administration with broiler performance, decreased population levels of Lactobacillus salivarius, and reduced bile salt deconjugation in the ileum of broiler chickens. Poultry Science, 85: 2186–2194.
Horn NL, Donkin SS, Applegate TJ and Adeola O, 2009.  Intestinal  mucin  dynamics: Response  of  broiler  chicks  and White Pekin ducklings  to  dietary  threonine.  Poultry Science 88: 1906-1914.
Jafari Nadooshan H, 2011. Effect of Duration of Early Feed Restriction on Performance, Small Intestinal Morphology and Microflora of Broiler Chickens. M.Sc. Faculty of Agriculture. University of Zabol (In persian). 
Jahanpour H, Seidavi A, Qotbi AAA, Van Den Hoven R, Rocha e Silva S, Laudadio V and Tufarelli V, 2015. Effects of the level and duration of feeding restriction on carcass components of broilers. Archives of Animal Breeding 58: 99–105.
Julian RJ, 2005. Production and growth related disorders and other metabolic diseases of poultry-A   review. The Veterinary Journal. 169: 350-369.
Kannan M, Karunakaran R, Balakrishnan V and Prabhakar TG, 2005. Influence of prebiotics supplementation on lipid profile of broilers. Poultry Science 4: 994-997.‏
Khajali F, Zamani Mmoghaddam AK and Asadi Khoshoei E, 2007. Application of an early skip - a - day feed restriction on physiological parameters, carcass traits and development of ascites in male broilers reared under regular or cold temperatures at high altitude. Animal Science Journal 78: 159-163.
Khetani TL, Nkukwana TT and Chimonyo M, 2009. Effect of quantitative feed restriction on broiler performance. Journal Tropical Animal Health and Production 41: 379-384.
Madsen K, Cornish A, Soper P, McKaigney C, Jijon H, Yachimec C, Doyle J, Jewell L and De Simone C, 2001. Probiotic bacteria enhance murine and human intestinal epithelial barrier function. Gastroenterology 121: 580–591.
Patten LD  and  Waldroup PW, 1988. Use  of organic  acids  in  broiler  diets.  Poultry  Science 67: 1178-1182.
Pinheiro DF, Cruz VC, Sartori JR and Vicentini Paulino MLM, 2004. Effect of Early Feed Restriction and Enzyme Supplementation on Digestive Enzyme Activities in Broilers. Poultry Science. 83: 1544–1550.
Rezaei M and Hajati H, 2010. Effect of diet dilution at early age on performance, carcass characteristics and blood parameters of broiler chicks. Italian Journal of Animal Science.‏ 9 (1): 93-100.
Richards MP, Poch SM., Coon CN, Rosebrough RW, Ashwell CM and McMurtry JP, 2003. Feed restriction significantly alters lipogenic gene expression inbroiler breeder chickens. The Journal of Nutrition 133: 707–715.
Saleh EA, Watkins SE, Waldroup AL and Waldroup PW, 2005. Effects of early quantitative feed restriction on live performance and carcass composition of male broilers grown for further processing. Journal of Applied Poultry Research 14: 87-93.
Salma U, Miha AG Make T, Nishimura M and Tsujii H, 2007. Effect of fatty acid composition in broiler meat. Poultry Science 86:1920-1926.
Samik KP, Gobinda H, Manas KM and Gautam S, 2007. Effect of organic acid salt on the  performance  and  gut  health  of  broiler chicken. Poultry Science 44: 389-395.
     SAS Institute INS. 2004. SAS/STAT Users Guide. Version 9.1, SAS Institute INC. Cary, NC.
Taherpour K, Moravej H, Shivazad M, Adibmoradi M and Yakhchali B, 2009. Effect of dietary probiotic, prebiotic and butyric acid glycerides on performance and serum composition in broiler chickens. African Journal of Biotechnology 8: 2329-2334 .
Urdaneta-Rincon M and Lesson S, 2002. Quantitative and qualitative feed restriction on growth characteristics of male broiler chickens. Poultry Science 81: 679-688.
Wray C and Davies RH, 2002. Colibacillosis. Poultry Diseases. Edited by FTW Jordan, M. Pattison, D. Alexande, and T. Faragher. 5th ed. WB Saunders Company, USA. PP 125-130.‏
Zhan XA, Wang M, Ren H, Zhao RQ, Li JX and Tan ZL, 2007. Effect of early feed restriction on metabolic programming and compensatory growth in broiler chickens. Poultry Science 86: 654-660.‏
Zulkifli I, Che Norma MT, Israf DA and Omar AR 2000. The effect of early age feed restriction on subsequent response to high environmental temperatures in female broiler chickens. Poultry Science 79: 1401–1407.