بررسی تاثیر اسیدهای صفراوی بر عملکرد، خصوصیات لاشه و فراسنجه‌های خونی در جوجه-های گوشتی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 گروه علوم دامی، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه ارومیه

2 گروه علوم دامی دانشگاه ارومیه

3 گروه علوم دامی دانشکده کشاورزی دانشگاه ارومیه

چکیده

زمینه مطالعه: جوجه‌های گوشتی در سنین اولیه به دلیل ترشح محدود اسیدهای صفراوی در هضم و جذب چربی‌ها مشکل دارند. هدف: بررسی اثر اسیدهای صفراوی بر عملکرد، خصوصیات لاشه و فراسنجه‌های خونی جوجه‌های گوشتی بود. روش‌کار: 300 قطعه جوجه گوشتی یک روزه راس 308 در یک آزمایش با 5 تیمار و 6 تکرار با 10 پرنده در هر تکرار استفاده شدند. پنج تیمار آزمایشی شامل: تیمار 1) جیره شاهد بر پایه ذرت و کنجاله سویا، تیمار 2) جیره پایه حاوی امولسیفایر، تیمار 3) جیره پایه حاوی 05/0 درصد اسید صفراوی، تیمار 4) جیره پایه حاوی 1/0 درصد اسید صفراوی و تیمار 5) جیره پایه حاوی 2/0 درصد اسید صفراوی بودند. آزمایش به مدت 42 روز و در مراحل آغازین (1 تا10 روزگی)، رشد (11 تا 24 روزگی) و پایانی (25 تا 42 روزگی) انجام شد. صفات عملکردی بصورت دوره‌ای و خصوصیات لاشه و فراسنجه‌های خونی در روز 42 آزمایش اندازه‌گیری شدند. نتایج: نتایج نشان داد که استفاده از سطوح مختلف اسیدهای صفراوی تاثیر معنی‌داری بر مصرف خوراک نداشت (05/0<P). اما مصرف سطح 1/0 درصد اسید صفراوی باعث بهبود افزایش وزن روزانه و ضریب تبدیل خوراک در دوره آغازین شد (05/0>P). چربی شکمی نیز هنگام استفاده از 1/0 درصد اسید صفراوی به طور معنی‌دار نسبت به تیمار شاهد کاهش یافت (05/0>P). غلظت تری‌گلیسیرید در پرندگان تغذیه شده با سطح 05/0 درصد اسید صفراوی و غلظت کلسترول و اسید اوریک در پرندگان دریافت کننده جیره حاوی امولسیفایر به طور معنی‌داری نسبت به تیمار شاهد کاهش پیدا کردند (05/0>P). نتیجه‌گیری نهایی: به طور کلی مشخص شد که مصرف 1/0 درصد اسیدهای صفراوی در جیره باعث بهبود عملکرد جوجه‌های گوشتی در دوره آغازین، خصوصیات لاشه و پروفایل لیپیدی خون می‌شود.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Investigating the effects of bile salts on performance, carcass characteristics and blood parameters in broilers

نویسندگان [English]

  • Seyed Mohamad Ali Mirhoseini 1
  • Parviz Farhoomand 2
  • Seyed Ali Mirghelenj 3
1 Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Urmia University
3 Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Urmia University
چکیده [English]

Introduction: Lipids (fat and oil) are the most concentrated sources of energy for animals, which are usually added to poultry diets to meet energy requirements for better performance (Abudabos 2014). However, there are problems with dietary lipid levels and digestibility in poultry, especially in young birds due to low bile secretion (Ravindran et al 2016). This physiological limitation of the poultry digestive system can be solved by using exogenous emulsifiers. Emulsifier can help increase the active level of lipids, stimulate the formation of micelles, and then increase the digestibility of dietary lipids and other nutrients in broilers (Siyal et al 2017). Upadhaya et al (2017) showed that 1, 3-diacylglycerol as an exogenous emulsifier can improve growth performance and increase nutrient digestibility in broilers. In addition, a large number of studies have also shown that exogenous emulsifier can improve meat quality and regulate fat metabolism of broilers (Zhao and Kim 2017). Bile acids are the main pathway of cholesterol catabolism in mammals. Cholesterol is converted into bile acids by changes in ring structure, oxidation and side chain shortening (Li and Chiang 2019). The chemistry of bile acids is complex due to the large variety of chemical structures in natural compounds such as cholic acid, kenodeoxycholic acid, deoxycholic acid, and lithocholic acid. Bile acids of birds are mainly composed of kenodeoxycholic acid and cholic acid (Hoffman and Hagee 2018). Recently, bile acids have been considered as an emulsifier to increase digestibility (Upadhaya et al 2019) and improve the performance of broiler chickens (Parsai et al 2007). Supplementation of bile acids in the diet of broilers significantly improves fat digestibility (Lammasak et al 2019). The effect of bile salts on performance, carcass characteristics and blood parameters of broiler chickens were investaigeted.
Material and methods: Three hundered one-day-old broilers (Ross 308) were divided into 5 treatments and 6 replications with 10 birds in each replication. Five experimental treatments included the control diet (corn soybean based diet), emulsifier (added to control diet) and three levels of 0.05%, 0.1% and 0.2% of poultry bile salts (added to control diet). All the dietary treatment were fed to the birds from day one to day 42 of age. The experiment lasted for 42 days and were performed during the starter (1-10 days), grower (11-24 days) and finisher (25-42 days). Performnce indices were measured during the difeferned periods and carcass characteristics and blood parameters were determined on day 42 of age. The data obtained from the present study were statistically analyzed using SAS statistical software and GLM procedure. To compare the means, Tukey's test was used.
Results and discussion: The results showed that consumption of different levels of bile salts had no significant effect on feed consumption (P<0.05). However, consumption of 0.1% bile salts improved body weight gain and feed conversion ratio during the starter period (P<0.05). Previous studies have shown that the consumption of 0.05% commercial emulsifier can improve the growth performance of broiler chickens (Wang et al 2016). In addition, in the present study, 0.05% poultry bile acids supplement significantly improved daily weight gain and feed conversion ratio during 1 to 10 days, which is consistent with the results of Alzawqari et al (2011) regarding bile. These researchers observed improvement in daily weight gain with 0.05% bovine bile acid supplementation. Arshad et al (2020) reported that feed intake was not affected by bile acid supplementation in the initial, growth, finisher and overall periods. In the newly hatched chick, the ability to digest and absorb dietary fat is poor as a result of limited bile secretion (Tancharonrat et al 2013). For this reason, artificial bile acid and bile salts have shown the greatest effect in young broiler chickens to improve fat digestion, and the improvement in the performance of birds receiving bile in the initial period of recent research was for this reason. The results of Maisonnier et al (2016) showed that 0.5% of pig bile acids can increase fat digestibility and body weight in broilers. These results may imply that the supplementation of bile acids in diets improved the growth performance of broiler chickens by increasing the solubility and digestibility of dietary fat and fat-soluble nutrients in this study. Abdominal fat decreased significantly by consumption of 0.1% bile salts (P<0.05). Subcutaneous fat and abdominal fat are considered as the main factors influencing the performance of poultry carcasses (Tůmová and Teimouri 2010). In agreement with our results, many researchers have pointed out the positive effects of emulsifier on reducing fat status and improving carcass quality in broiler chickens (Zhao and Kim 2017). Blood triglyceride concentration was decreased in 0.05% bile salts fed birds wherease cholesterol and uric acid concentrations decreased in the birds fed emulsifier (P<0.05). Triglyceride, cholesterol, HDL and LDL blood are key indicators of lipid metabolism balance (Helkin et al 2017). In agreement with our results, researchers reported that bile acids increased hepatic AST and ALT activity in broilers and reduced serum triglyceride levels, which could be due to the participation of these enzymes in the lipogenesis process (Ge et al 2019). In addition, Siyal et al (2017) showed that feed emulsifier can reduce serum triglyceride concentration in broilers. It can also be stated that bile acids may enhance fat catabolism and inhibit fat synthesis by regulating the expression of genes related to lipid metabolism which may play a pivotal role in improving serum lipid profile and reducing fat deposition in broiler chickens (Ge et al 2019).
Conclusions: Totally, it was found that dietary bile salts supplementation improves the performance of, carcass characteristics and blood lipids in broiler chcikens.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Abdominal fat
  • Bile acid
  • Body weight
  • Broilers
  • Emulsifier
Abudabos AM, 2014. Effect of fat source, energy level and enzyme supplementation and their interactions on broiler performance. South African Journal of Animal Science 44(3): 280-287.
Alabi OJ, Ng'Ambi JW and Norris D, 2013. Dietary energy level for optimum productivity and carcass characteristics of indigenous Venda chickens raised in closed confinement. South African Journal of Animal Science 43(5): 75-80.
Alzawqari M, Moghaddam HN, Kermanshahi H and Raji AR, 2011. The effect of desiccated ox bile supplementation on performance, fat digestibility, gut morphology and blood chemistry of broiler chickens fed tallow diets. Journal of Applied Animal Research 39(2): 169-174.
Arshad MA, Bhatti SA, Hassan I, Rahman MA and Rehman MS, 2020. Effects of bile acids and lipase supplementation in low-energy diets on growth performance, fat digestibility and meat quality in broiler chickens. Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science 22(2): 1-8.
Fouad AM and El-Senousey, HK, 2014. Nutritional factors affecting abdominal fat deposition in poultry: a review. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 27(7): 1057–1068.
Cho JH, Zhao P and Kim IH, 2012. Effects of emulsifier and multi-enzyme in different energy densitydiet on growth performance, blood profiles, and relative organ weight in broiler chickens. Journal of Agricultural Science, 4: 161.
Ge XK, Wang AA, Ying ZX, Zhang LG, Su WP, Cheng K, Feng CC, Zhou YM, Zhang LL and Wang T, 2019. Effects of diets with different energy and bile acids levels on growth performance and lipid metabolism in broilers. Poultry Science 98(2): 887-895.
Helkin A, Stein JJ, Lin S, Siddiqui S, Maier KG and Gahtan V, 2016. Dyslipidemia part 1—review of lipid metabolism and vascular cell physiology. Vascular and Endovascular Surgery 50(2): 107-118.
Hofmann AF, 2008. Hagey LR. Bile acids: chemistry, pathochemistry, biology, pathobiology, therapeutics. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences 65: 2461-2483.
Hu YD, Lan D, Zhu Y, Pang HZ, Mu XP and Hu XF, 2018. Effect of diets with different energy and lipase levels on performance, digestibility and carcass trait in broilers. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences 31(8): 1275.
Huang J, Yang D, Gao S and Wang T, 2008. Effects of soy-lecithin on lipid metabolism and hepatic expression of lipogenic genes in broiler chickens. Livestock Science 118(1-2): 53-60.
Lai W, Cao A, Li J, Zhang W and Zhang L, 2018. Effect of high dose of bile acids supplementation in broiler feed on growth performance, clinical blood metabolites, and organ development. Journal of Applied Poultry Research 27(4): 532-539.
Lammasak K, Kijpakorn S and Angkanaporn K, 2019. Corrigendum to: Porcine bile powder supplementation of a high fat broiler diet in relation to growth performance and nutrient digestion. Animal Production Science 59(7): 1399-1399.
Li T and Chiang JY, 2014. Bile acid signaling in metabolic disease and drug therapy. Pharmacological Reviews, 66(4): 948-983.
Maisonnier S, Gomez J, Bree A, Berri C, Baeza E and Carre B, 2003. Effects of microflora status, dietary bile salts and guar gum on lipid digestibility, intestinal bile salts, and histomorphology in broiler chickens. Poultry Science 82(5): 805-814.
Muhammad AT, Arif M and Saeed M, 2016. Emulsifier effect on fat utilization in broiler chicken. Asian Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances 11(3): 158-167.
Niu Z, Shi J, Liu F, Wang X, Gao C and Yao L, 2009. Effects of dietary energy and protein on growth performance and carcass quality of broilers during starter phase. International Journal of Poultry Science 8(5): 508-511.
Noel OF, Still CD, Argyropoulos G, Edwards M and Gerhard GS, 2016. Bile acids, FXR, and metabolic effects of bariatric surgery. Journal of obesity 1-8.
Parsaie S, Shariatmadari F, Zamiri MJ and Khajeh K, 2007. Influence of wheat-based diets supplemented with xylanase, bile acid and antibiotics on performance, digestive tract measurements and gut morphology of broilers compared with a maize-based diet. British poultry science 48(5): 594-600.
Piekarski A, Decuypere E, Buyse J and Dridi S, 2016. Chenodeoxycholic acid reduces feed intake and modulates the expression of hypothalamic neuropeptides and hepatic lipogenic genes in broiler chickens. General and Comparative Endocrinology 229: 74-83.
Ravindran V, Tancharoenrat P, Zaefarian F and Ravindran G, 2016. Fats in poultry nutrition: Digestive physiology and factors influencing their utilisation. Animal Feed Science and Technology 213: 1-21.
Russell DW, 2009. Fifty years of advances in bile acid synthesis and metabolism. Journal of Lipid Research 50: 120-125.
Siyal FA, Babazadeh D, Wang C, Arain MA, Saeed M, Ayasan T, Zhang L and Wang T, 2017. Emulsifiers in the poultry industry. World's Poultry Science Journal 73(3): 611-620.
Tancharoenrat P, Ravindran V, Zaefarian F and Ravindran G, 2013. Influence of age on the apparent metabolisable energy and total tract apparent fat digestibility of different fat sources for broiler chickens. Animal Feed Science and Technology 186(3-4): 186-192.
Tůmová E and Teimouri AJ, 2010. Fat deposition in the broiler chicken: a review. Scientia Agriculturae Bohemica 41(2): 121-128.
Upadhaya SD, Park JW, Park JH and Kim IH, 2017. Efficacy of 1, 3-diacylglycerol as a fat emulsifier in low-density diet for broilers. Poultry Science 96(6): 1672-1678.
Upadhaya SD, Yun KS, Zhao PY, Lee IS and Kim IH, 2019. Emulsifier as a feed additive in poultry and pigs-a review. Animal Nutrition and Feed Technology, 19(2): 323-336.
Wang JP, Zhang ZF, Yan L and Kim IH, 2016. Effects of dietary supplementation of emulsifier and carbohydrase on the growth performance, serum cholesterol and breast meat fatty acids profile of broiler chickens. Animal Science Journal 87(2): 250-256.
Xu Y, 2016. Recent progress on bile acid receptor modulators for treatment of metabolic diseases. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 59(14): 6553-6579.
Zhao PY and Kim IH, 2017. Effect of diets with different energy and lysophospholipids levels on performance, nutrient metabolism, and body composition in broilers. Poultry Science 96(5): 1341-1347.