تأثیر پرایمینگ بر عملکرد جوانه، ترکیب شیمیایی، قابلیت هضم و جمعیت پروتوزوآی شکمبه‌ای علوفه هیدروپونیک جو و مقایسه آن با قصیل جو

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 گروه علوم دامی دانشگاه گنبد کاووس

2 دانش آموخته کارشناسی ارشد

3 گروه علوم دامی دانشکده کشاورزی دانشگاه گنبد

10.22034/as.2026.68227.1783

چکیده

زمینه مطالعاتی: چالش‌های فزاینده ناشی از تغییرات اقلیمی و خشکسالی‌های مداوم، نیاز به یافتن راهکارهای نوین و پایدار برای تأمین علوفه دام را دوچندان ساخته است. در این میان، سیستم‌های کشت هیدروپونیک به عنوان گزینه‌ای کارآمد برای تولید علوفه سبز مطرح شده‌اند. هدف: ارزیابی تأثیر تیمارهای مختلف پرایمینگ بر صفات جوانه‌زنی، ترکیب شیمیایی، قابلیت هضم و فراسنجه‌های تخمیری شکمبه‌ای علوفه هیدروپونیک جو و مقایسه آن با قصیل جو انجام شد. بذرهای جو پس از ضدعفونی سطحی با محلول هیپوکلریت سدیم 1 درصد به مدت 5 دقیقه و شستشو با آب مقطر، تحت تیمارهای پرایمینگ قرار گرفتند. تیمارهای آزمایشی شامل: 1) شاهد (بذر خشک)، 2) هیدروپرایمینگ 12 ساعت، 3) هالوپرایمینگ، نیترات پتاسیم 1 درصد، 24 ساعت، 4) اسموپرایمینگ، پلی‌اتیلن گلایکول 5/13 درصد، 12 ساعت، 5) هورموپرایمینگ، اسید سالیسیلیک ppm 50، 12 ساعت، 6) هورموپرایمینگ، سایتوکنین ppm 50، 12 ساعت و 7) هورموپرایمینگ، جیبرلین ppm 50، 24 ساعت، بودند. نتایج‌: نتایج نشان داد که پرایمینگ به طور معنی‌داری سرعت جوانه‌زنی و شاخص بنیه بذر را بهبود بخشید (01/0>P)؛ به‌ویژه تیمار سایتوکنین بالاترین سرعت جوانه‌زنی (64/23) و نیترات پتاسیم بالاترین شاخص بنیه بذر (1/20838) را داشت. از نظر ترکیب شیمیایی، تیمار شاهد (عدم پرایمینگ) بالاترین ماده خشک (37/26 درصد) و پروتئین خام (61/19 درصد) را نشان داد، در حالی که پرایمینگ با سایتوکنین و سالیسیلیک اسید به افزایش پتانسیل تولید گاز (حدود 387 میلی‌لیتر بر گرم ماده خشک) و اسیدهای چرب کوتاه زنجیر (حدود 51/1 میلی‌مول) منجر شد. قابلیت هضم ماده خشک و آلی علوفه هیدروپونیک شاهد و آب مقطر (به ترتیب 2/78 درصد و 01/79 درصد برای قابلیت هضم ماده خشک و آلی برای تیمارشاهد) به طور معنی‌داری بالاتر از سایر تیمارها و قصیل جو (53/55 درصد) بود. پرایمینگ به طور کلی جمعیت کل پروتوزوآی شکمبه‌ای را در مقایسه با تیمار شاهد (حدود 105 ×323 سلول بر میلی‌لیتر) کاهش داد. نتیجه‌گیری کلی: در مجموع، نتایج نشان داد که پرایمینگ می‌تواند برخی از جنبه‌های جوانه‌زنی و ویژگی‌های تغذیه‌ای علوفه هیدروپونیک جو را تحت تأثیر قرار دهد، اما باید با دقت ارزیابی شود تا اثرات مطلوب بر ترکیب شیمیایی و فراسنجه‌های شکمبه‌ای حاصل شود. همچنین، علوفه هیدروپونیک جو، صرف‌نظر از تیمار پرایمینگ، در بسیاری از جنبه‌های تغذیه‌ای نسبت به قصیل جو برتری دارد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Effect of Priming on Sprout Performance, Chemical Composition, Digestibility, and Rumen Protozoa Population of Hydroponic Barley Fodder, Compared to Conventional Barley Forage

نویسندگان [English]

  • javad bayatkouhsar 1
  • monireh bahlakeh 2
  • farzad ghanbari 3
  • ashour mohammad gharehbash 3
  • ali rahemi 3
1 gonbad kavous universiry
2 Department of gonbad kavous university
3 department of gonbad kavous university
چکیده [English]

The escalating challenges posed by climate change and recurrent droughts have significantly intensified the need for novel and sustainable strategies to ensure adequate livestock feed supply. In this critical context, hydroponic cultivation systems have emerged as an efficient and promising alternative for producing green fodder. This innovative soil-less technology enables the commercial production of plants from germination to harvest, offering a consistent, year-round feed source. Hydroponic systems meticulously control environmental factors like temperature, light, humidity, and ventilation, facilitating the daily production of substantial quantities of nutritious green fodder, applicable for diverse livestock. A paramount advantage of this method lies in its optimized water consumption, requiring significantly less water per kilogram of fodder produced compared to conventional agriculture. Barley is a particularly suitable grain for hydroponic fodder. Its germination process activates crucial biochemical pathways, involving the breakdown of stored starch, protein, and lipid reserves, leading to enhanced soluble sugars, protein, and other nutrients in the fodder. To further optimize both the quality and speed of germination in hydroponic cultivation, seed priming has been identified as an effective strategy. Priming involves pre-soaking seeds in specific solutions (water, nutrients, or hormones) for a defined period, followed by drying, which enhances germination by activating vital metabolic pathways. While existing research has explored priming's quantitative and qualitative effects, there's a notable gap in studies specifically examining its comprehensive impact on chemical composition, digestibility, and ruminal fermentation parameters within hydroponic systems. Therefore, this study aimed to comprehensively evaluate the effects of various priming treatments on germination traits, chemical composition, digestibility, and ruminal protozoal population of hydroponic barley fodder, comparing it with traditional barley hay.
Materials and Methods: This comprehensive research was conducted in 2018 at Gonbad Kavous University laboratories, following a completely randomized design with three replications. Barley seeds, disinfected with 1% sodium hypochlorite and rinsed, underwent seven priming treatments: 1) Control (dry seeds), 2) Hydropriming (distilled water, 12 h), 3) Halopriming (1% potassium nitrate, 24 h), 4) Osmopriming (13.5% polyethylene glycol, 12 h), 5) Hormopriming with Salicylic Acid (50 ppm, 12 h), 6) Hormopriming with Cytokinin (50 ppm, 12 h), and 7) Hormopriming with Gibberellin (50 ppm, 24 h). After priming, seeds were dried and cultivated hydroponically for 7 days. For comparison, traditional barley hay was also cultivated. Chemical composition (DM, OM, Ash, EE and CP) was determined by AOAC (2005) methods. NDF and ADF were quantified following Van Soest et al. (1991). TDN, NEL, and NEg were estimated using NRC (2001) relationships. In vitro gas production was assessed using rumen fluid from fistulated sheep. Gas production was recorded over time, and parameters were calculated using the Ørskov and McDonald (1979) model. SCFA, estimated OMD and ME were also determined. In vitro digestibility was measured via the batch culture method (Theodorou et al., 1994), including microbial biomass production and ammonia nitrogen. Ruminal protozoa were enumerated microscopically. Data were statistically analyzed using SAS (2000) GLM procedure, with means compared by LSD test.
Results: Results showed that priming significantly improved germination speed (P<0.01) and seedling vigor index (P<0.01); specifically, cytokinin exhibited the highest germination speed (23.64), and potassium nitrate resulted in the highest seedling vigor index (20838.1). Regarding chemical composition, the control (non-primed) treatment showed the highest dry matter (26.37%) and crude protein (19.61%), while priming with cytokinin and salicylic acid led to increased gas production potential (approx. 387 mL/g DM) and short-chain fatty acids (approx. 1.51 mmol). In vitro dry matter and organic matter digestibility of control and distilled water-primed hydroponic fodder (e.g., 78.2% DMD and 79.01% OMD for control) were significantly higher than other treatments and conventional barley forage (55.53% DMD). Priming generally reduced the total rumen protozoa population compared to the control (approx. 323×105 cells/mL).
CThe escalating challenges posed by climate change and recurrent droughts have significantly intensified the need for novel and sustainable strategies to ensure adequate livestock feed supply. In this critical context, hydroponic cultivation systems have emerged as an efficient and promising alternative for producing green fodder. This innovative soil-less technology enables the commercial production of plants from germination to harvest, offering a consistent, year-round feed source. Hydroponic systems meticulously control environmental factors like temperature, light, humidity, and ventilation, facilitating the daily production of substantial quantities of nutritious green fodder, applicable for diverse livestock. A paramount advantage of this method lies in its optimized water consumption, requiring significantly less water per kilogram of fodder produced compared to conventional agriculture. Barley is a particularly suitable grain for hydroponic fodder. Its germination process activates crucial biochemical pathways, involving the breakdown of stored starch, protein, and lipid reserves, leading to enhanced soluble sugars, protein, and other nutrients in the fodder. To further optimize both the quality and speed of germination in hydroponic cultivation, seed priming has been identified as an effective strategy. Priming involves pre-soaking seeds in specific solutions (water, nutrients,
Materials and Methods: This comprehensive research was conducted in 2018 at Gonbad Kavous University laboratories, following a completely randomized design with three replications. Barley seeds, disinfected with 1% sodium hypochlorite and rinsed, underwent seven priming treatments: 1) Control (dry seeds), 2) Hydropriming (distilled water, 12 h), 3) Halopriming (1% potassium nitrate, 24 h), 4) Osmopriming (13.5% polyethylene glycol, 12 h), 5) Hormopriming with Salicylic Acid (50 ppm, 12 h), 6) Hormopriming with Cytokinin (50 ppm, 12 h), and 7) Hormopriming with Gibberellin (50 ppm, 24 h). After priming, seeds were dried and cultivated hydroponically for 7 days. For comparison, traditional barley hay was also cultivated. Chemical composition (DM, OM, Ash, EE and CP) was determined by AOAC (2005) methods. NDF and ADF were quantified following Van Soest et al. (1991). TDN, NEL, and NEg were estimated using NRC (2001) relationships. In vitro gas production was assessed using rumen fluid from fistulated sheep. Gas production was recorded over time, and parameters were calculated using the Ørskov and McDonald (1979) model. SCFA, estimated OMD and ME were also determined. In vitro digestibility was measured via the batch culture method (Theodorou et al., 1994), including microbial biomass production and ammonia nitrogen. Ruminal protozoa were enumerated microscopically. Data were statistically analyzed using SAS (2000) GLM procedure, with means compared by LSD test.
Results: Results showed that priming significantly improved germination speed (P<0.01) and seedling vigor index (P<0.01); specifically, cytokinin exhibited the highest germination speed (23.64), and potassium nitrate resulted in the highest seedling vigor index (20838.1). Regarding chemical composition, the control (non-primed) treatment showed the highest dry matter (26.37%) and crude protein (19.61%), while priming with cytokinin and salicylic acid led to increased gas production potential (approx. 387 mL/g DM) and short-chain fatty acids (approx. 1.51 mmol). In vitro dry matter and organic matter digestibility of control and distilled water-primed hydroponic fodder (e.g., 78.2% DMD and 79.01% OMD for control) were significantly higher than other treatments and conventional barley forage (55.53% DMD). Priming generally reduced the total rumen protozoa population compared to the control (approx. 323×105 cells/mL).
Conclusion: Overall, the findings indicate that priming can influence certain aspects of hydroponic barley fodder's germination and nutritional characteristics. However, its application requires careful evaluation to ensure optimal effects on chemical composition and rumen parameters. Notably, hydroponic barley fodder consistently demonstrated superiority in many nutritional aspects compared to conventional barley forage, regardless of the specific priming treatment.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Hydroponic fodder
  • Seed priming
  • Barley
  • in vitro digestibility
  • Microbial protein
  • Protozoa
Afzal I, Basra SMA and Ahmad N, 2005. Priming and hardening improve stand establishment and yield of spring maize. Journal of Agronomy & Crop Science 191(2): 112-118.
Afzal I, Basra S.M.A and Nawaz N, 2006. Potential of seed priming for improving wheat performance under saline conditions. Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Sciences 43(1-2): 1-8.
Afzal I, Basra SMA, Shahid M and Ahmad N, 2008. Priming-induced changes in the germination and early seedling growth of wheat. Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development 6(1): 17-25.
Aisha ZS, Mahmoud MF and Abdel Rahman M, 2007. Effect of potassium nitrate on growth, yield and chemical constituents of soybean plants. World Journal of Agricultural Sciences 3(2): 200-205.
Akbak MA, Sarwar M, Nisa M and Hussain K, 2014. Nutritional evaluation of hydroponically grown barley fodder: A review. Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences 24(3): 856-862.
Al-Karaki G N and Al-Momani N, 2011. Evaluation of some barley cultivars for green fodder production and water use efficiency under hydroponic conditions. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 197(6): 448–456.
Al-Karaki GN and Al-Momani A, 2011. Nutrient uptake and growth of wheat under hydroponic culture as affected by nutrient solution composition. Journal of Plant Nutrition 34(6): 920-928.
Basra SMA, Afzal I and Malik MA, 2005. Pre-sowing seed treatments improve seedling vigour and yield of fine rice. International Journal of Agriculture & Biology 7(1): 101-105.
Belleti P, Gatti E and Gatti E, 1993. Evaluation of seed vigor in peas. Seed Science and Technology 21(3): 577-584.
Beuvink JMW and Spoelstra SF, 1992. Effects of some silage additives on the fermentation of whole-crop maize silage. Grass and Forage Science 47(2): 127-133.
Blummel M and Becker K, 1997. The degradability characteristics of fifty-four roughages and roughage neutral-detergent fibers as described by in vitro gas production and their relationship to voluntary feed intake. British Journal of Nutrition 77: 757-768.
Blümmel M and Ørskov ER, 1993. Comparison of in vitro gas production and nylon bag degradability of straw. Animal Feed Science and Technology 40(2): 113-118.
Bradford KJ, 1998. Stress and seed germination. Advances in Agronomy 62: 57-123.
Brault M and Maldiney R, 1999. Biosynthesis and metabolism of cytokinins. Physiologia Plantarum 105(2): 380-388.
Broderick GA and Kang JH, 1980. Automated simultaneous determination of ammonia and total amino acids in ruminal fluid and in vitro media. Journal of Animal Science 63: 64–75.
Cheryl LA, 2004. The effects of seed treatments on seed vigor and germination in hybrid maize (Master's thesis). University of Pretoria.
Cuin TA, Miller RJ and Miller AJ, 2003. Potassium transport in plants: Molecular and cellular aspects. Journal of Experimental Botany 54(389): 1637-1645.
Dehority BA, 1993. Laboratory manual for classification and morphology of rumen ciliate protozoa. CRC press, Inc, Boca Raton. FL.
Dong J, Yu J, and Cai K, 2010. Effects of gibberellic acid on germination and seedling growth of rice under salt stress. African Journal of Biotechnology 9(26): 3986-3991.
Dung DD, Godwin IR and Nolan JV, 2010. Nutrient content and in Sacco digestibility of barley grain and sprouted barley. Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances 9(18): 2485–2492.
Dung DD, Godwin IR and McLennan SR, 2005. Nutrient content and digestibility of ensiled tropical forages. Animal Feed Science and Technology 124(1-2): 1-13.
El-Basioni RA, 2006. Effect of potassium sources and methods of application on growth, yield and quality of potato. Journal of Applied Sciences Research 2(10): 652-658.
El-Shazly K and Hungate RE, 1965. The effect of amino acid supply on the rate of gas production by rumen microbes. Applied Microbiology 13(6): 947-951.
Elumalai S, Panneerselvam R and Arumugam R, 2002. Influence of seed priming on germination and seedling vigour in blackgram (Vigna mungo L. Hepper). Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 188(1): 1-5.
Farooq M and Azam MA, 2006. The effect of seed priming on germination and seedling vigor of maize under drought stress. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 192(6): 406-410.
Farooq M, Basra SMA, Ahmad N and Saleem S, 2006. The role of seed priming in alleviating the adverse effects of salinity on mungbean (Vigna radiata L.) production. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 192(3): 199-205.
Fazaeli H, Golmohammadi HA, Shoayee AA, Montajebi N and Mosharraf S, 2012. Performance of feedlot calves fed hydroponics fodder barley. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology 14: 109–119.
Getachew G, Depiters EJ and Robinson PH, 2002. In vitro gas production provides effective method for assessing ruminant feeds. California Agriculture 58: 54-58.
Hafla M, Syafriad S and Budiarsa IN, 2014. The effect of different substrates on the growth and yield of hydroponic barley fodder. Journal of Animal Science and Technology 4(2): 100-107.
Hajar EA, Alamri SA and Al-Zahrani S, 1996. Physiological effects of salicylic acid on seed germination and seedling growth of wheat. Journal of Arid Environments 34(2): 241-249.
Hanan SM. 2007. Effect of salicylic acid on germination and seedling growth of maize under salt stress. World Journal of Agricultural Sciences 3(2): 206-210.
Hedden P and Sponsel V, 2015. A century of gibberellin research. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation 34(4): 740–760.
Hillyer GM and Perry GC, 2003. Hydroponic forage. In Forages: The science of grassland agriculture (6th ed., pp. 699-708). Iowa State University Press.
Hungate RE, 1966. The rumen and its microbes. Academic Press.
Iqbal M, Ashraf M and Jamil A, 2006. Seed priming improves physiological aspects of wheat under salinity stress. Pakistan Journal of Botany 38(5): 1367-1376.
Jamali M, 2013. Effect of gibberellic acid on germination and early seedling growth of barley under drought stress (Master's thesis). University of Tehran.
Karanataka SM, 2011. The impact of various pre-sowing treatments on seed germination and seedling vigour of rice (Oryza sativa L.) (Master's thesis). University of Agricultural Sciences, Bangalore, India.
Kaur S, Gupta AK and Kaur Nو 2005. Seed priming Increases Crop yield possibly by Modulating enzymes of Sucrose metabolism in chickpea. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 191: 81-87.
Khodary SEA, 2004. Effect of salicylic acid on growth, photosynthesis, and some metabolic activities of maize plants grown under salt stress. Egyptian Journal of Physiological Sciences 28(2): 173-192.
Kide W, Desalegn K and Teshome D, 2019. Hydroponic fodder production: an alternative technology for sustainable livestock feed production under climate change. International Journal of Agricultural Research 14(3): 101–108.
Krishnamoorthy U, Sivasamy S and Mohanty SK, 1991. Relationship between gas production and microbial protein synthesis in tropical feeds. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 35(1-2): 133-142.
Lara A, Lopez A and Gomez C, 2014. Nitric oxide: A key molecule in plant abiotic stress tolerance. Journal of Plant Physiology 171(1): 10-22.
Maathuis FJM and Sanders D, 1996. Mechanisms of potassium absorption by plant roots. Journal of Experimental Botany 47(294): 881-897.
Makkar HPS, 2005. In vitro gas methods for evaluation of feeds containing phytochemicals. Animal of Feed Science and Techmology 123: 291-302.
McSweeney CS, Palmer B, McNeill DM and Krause DO, 2001. Microbial interactions with tannins: Nutritional consequences for ruminants. Animal Feed Science and Technology 91(3-4): 213-228.
Menke KH and Steingass H, 1988. Estimation of the energetic feed value from chemical analysis and in vitro gas production using rumen fluid for ruminants. Animal Research and Development 28: 7-55.
Menke KH and Steingass HH, 1988. Estimation of the energetic feed value obtained from chemical analysis and in vitro gas production using rumen fluid. Journal of Animal research and development 28: 7-55.
Menke KH, Raab L, Solewski A, Steingass H, Fritz D and Schneider W, 1979. The estimation of the digestibility and metabolisable energy content of ruminant feeding stuffs from the gas production when they are incubated with rumen liquor in vitro. Journal of Agriculture science 93: 217-222.
Mesdaghi M, 2005. Seed physiology. Tehran University Press.
Moghaddam MR, 2003. Plant hormones. University of Mashhad Press.
Morgan JB, Morgan LM and Breen JJ, 1992. Hydroponic production of oat forage. Journal of Plant Nutrition 15(1): 143-156.
Mousavi SR, Sadeghzadeh A and Moosavi SB, 2009. The effect of seed priming on germination and seedling growth of barley under salt stress. Journal of Agricultural Sciences 1(3): 201-209.
Naik P K, Dhuri R B, Swain B K and Singh N P, 2015. Nutritional evaluation of hydroponics fodder. Indian Journal of Animal Nutrition 32(1): 1–9.
Nascimento WM and Aragão VF, 2004. Seed priming with plant growth regulators in bell pepper (Capsicum annuum L.). Seed Science and Technology 32(3): 661-667.
National Research Council (NRC), 2001. Nutrient Requirements of Dairy Cattle. 7th Rev. Ed. Natl. Acad. Sci., (Washington DC).
Ohara M and Ohki K, 1973. Production of volatile fatty acids by rumen micro-organisms. Japanese Journal of Zootechnical Science 44(4): 183-189.
Ohara M, Sato K and Ohki K, 1974. Production of carbon dioxide by rumen micro-organisms. Japanese Journal of Zootechnical Science 45(1): 1-6.
Opatpatanakit Y, Shingfield KJ and Runciman D, 1994. Prediction of metabolisable energy from chemical composition and in vitro gas production of forages. Animal Feed Science and Technology 47(3-4): 213-224.
Orskov ER and McDonald I, 1979. The estimation of protein degradability in the rumen from incubation measurements weighted according to rate of passage. Journal of Agriculture Science 92: 499-503.
Peer DJ and Leeson S, 1985. Nutritive value of hydroponically grown barley for poultry. Poultry Science 64(2): 342-348.
Pitt RE, Sniffen CJ and Van Kessel JS, 1996. Development of a mechanistic model for the prediction of protein supply to dairy cows. Animal Feed Science and Technology 59(1-3): 87-101.
Ramadan MF, El-Sayed AB and El-Gharabawy MI, 2010. Seed priming with potassium nitrate improves germination and seedling growth of soybean. Journal of American Science 6(5): 1-8.
SAS, 2003. SAS User’s Guide: Statistics, Version 9.1 Edition. SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA.
Scalbert A, 1991. Antimicrobial properties of tannins. Phytochemistry 30(12): 3875-3883.
Shakirova FI, Sakhabutdinova AR, Bezrukova MV, Fatkhutdinova DR and Fatkhutdinova RI. 2003. Changes in hormonal status of wheat plants induced by salicylic acid. Plant Science 164(4): 317-331.
Sneath R and McIntosh F, 2003. Hydroponic fodder for livestock. Agriculture Victoria 3(2): 1-4.
Snow A, Smith RG and Smith JM, 2004. The nutritive value of hydroponically grown forage in the diets of beef cattle. Journal of Animal Science 82(Suppl. 1): 1-2.
Song J and Chung GS, 1993. Effects of polyethylene glycol (PEG) on seed germination and seedling growth of rice. Korean Journal of Crop Science 38(3): 290-295.
Sun Y, Wang X and Liu X, 2016. Effects of polyethylene glycol on seed germination and early seedling growth of spring wheat under drought stress. Journal of Arid Land 8(3): 441-450.
Taiz L and Zeiger E, 2015. Plant Physiology and Development. 6th Edition. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA, USA.
Teodoro RL, Beuvink JMW and Van Vuuren AM, 1995. Comparison of gas production and dry matter digestibility of selected temperate forages. Animal Feed Science and Technology 54(3): 223-233.
Theodor E, Al-Shazly K and El-Badawy A, 2003. Nutrient digestibility of green hydroponic barley. Egyptian Journal of Nutrition and Feeds 6(1): 11-20.
Van Soest, PJ, Robertson JB and Lewis BA, 1991. Methods of dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber and non-starch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of  Dairy Science 74(10): 3583-3597.
Wolin MJ, 1960. A theoretical rumen fermentation. Journal of Dairy Science 43(10): 1452-1459.