Impact of litter and litter amendments on blood variables and immunity of broiler chickens

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 Department of Animal Science, Rasht Branch, Islamic Azad University, Rasht, Iran

2 Department of Biology, Rasht Branch, Islamic Azad University, Rasht, Iran

3 , ICAAM & Department of Veterinary Medicine, Universidade de Évora [Pole at Mitra], Évora, Portugal

چکیده

زمینه مطالعاتی: کف سالن پرورش جوجه­ها شاملبستر و مواد اضافه شده ناشی از دفع مدفوع، خوراک، پرها و آب است. در حال حاضر پذیرفته شده است که کیفیت بستر ممکن است منشأ مشکلات زیست محیطی و مدیریتی در صنعت طیور تجاری باشد. مطالعات متعددی در مورد تأثیر جنس یا کیفیت مواد بستر بر سلامت روده و ایمنی طیور در دسترس است، اما اغلب آنها بر روی عوامل بیماری­زای خاصی که به طور بالقوه برای انسان یا دام های دیگر مضر هستند و یا سبب محدودیت بر عملکرد جوجه­های گوشتی می­شوند متمرکز شده­اند. هدف: این مطالعه با هدف ارزیابی این­که آیا نوع مواد بستر (ماسه، تراشه چوب و رول کاغذی) یا افزودن دو ماده شیمیایی (آهک و بنتونیت در مقابل گروه کنترل) ممکن است در پارامترهای خونی و مصونیت جوجه­های گوشتی اختلال ایجاد کند انجام شد. روش کار: دویست و هفتاد جوجه گوشتی نر سویه راس به طور تصادفی به نه تیمار با سه تکرار در هر تیمار (در مجموع 30 پرنده در هر تیمار) تخصیص داده شدند. از آزمایش فاکتوریل 3×3 بر پایه طرح کاملاً تصادفی استفاده شد. حیوانات وارد قفس­های زمینی شدند که حاوی بسترهای مختلف (ماسه ، تراشه چوب و رول کاغذی) و مواد شیمیایی (بدون تغییر یا شاهد، بنتونیت و آهک) بودند. هر تکرار شامل 10 جوجه بود و در مجموع 27 واحد آزمایشی استفاده شد. از روز اول، نه گروه­ آزمایشی با توجه به جنس بستر و مواد شیمیایی افزوده شده، به شرح زیر ایجاد شد: گروه 1: - بستر ماسه بدون افزودنی؛ گروه 2: بستر ماسه همراه با بنتونیت؛ گروه 3: بستر ماسه همراه با آهک؛ گروه 4: بستر تراشه چوب بدون افزودنی؛ گروه 5: بستر تراشه چوب همراه با بنتونیت؛ گروه 6:بستر تراشه چوب همراه با آهک؛ گروه 7: بستر رول کاغذی بدون افزودنی؛ گروه 8: بستر رول کاغذی همراه با بنتونیت؛ و گروه 9:بستر رول کاغذی همراه با آهک. نتایج: یافته­ها نشان داد که سه نوع بستر استفاده شده (ماسه، تراشه چوب و رول کاغذی) اکثر صفات مورد بررسی را تحت تأثیر قرار نمی­دهند. اگرچه افزایش معنی­داری در تیترهای آنتی­بادی آنفلوانزا در روز 36 (P

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Impact of litter and litter amendments on blood variables and immunity of broiler chickens

نویسندگان [English]

  • G Taherparvar 1
  • AR Seidavi 1
  • L Asadpour 2
  • R Payan-Carreira 3
چکیده [English]

Introduction: Poultry litter is composed of bedding material, excreta, feed, feathers and water. It is currently accepted that litter quality can add to environmental and management problems in the commercial poultry industry. Several studies are available on the impact of litter material or quality on the intestinal health immunity of poultry, but often they focus on particular pathogens, potentially detrimental to humans or other livestock, or on imposed limitations to broilers performance. Aim: This study aimed to assess whether the type of bedding materials (sand, wood shaving, and paper) or chemical amendments (lime and bentonite vs. controls) affect blood parameters and immunity of broiler chickens. Materials and methods: Two hundred and seventy male Ross broiler chickens were randomly assigned into nine treatment groups with three replicates per each treatment (a total of 30 birds per each treatment). A completely randomized 3 × 3 design was used, with the main effects of bedding materials/subtracts (sand, wood shaving, or paper) and amendments (no amendment (control), bentonite, or lime), in three replicate pens of 10 chicks each, in a total of 27 experimental units. Starting at day one, groups were created according to the combination of beddings and amendments, as follows: Group 1 (Grp 1) - control sand bedding; Group 2 (Grp 2) - sand bedding treated with Bentonite; Group 3 (Grp 3) - sand bedding treated with lime; Group 4 (Grp 4) - control wood shaving bedding; Group 5 (Grp 5) - wood shaving bedding treated with Bentonite; Group 6 (Grp 6) - wood shaving treated with lime; Group 7 (Grp 7) - control paper bedding; Group 8 (Grp 8) - paper bedding treated with Bentonite; and Group 9 (Grp 9) - paper treated with lime. Results: The results showed that different bedding materials (sand, wood shavings, and paper) had not effect on most analyzed traits; though, we detected a small significant increase in the influenza antibody titres at day 36 (P < 0.05) in sand reared groups, and an increase in the total immunoglobulins (Ig) titres (due to increased IgM) on 14 days after challenged with sheep red blood cells (P < 0.05). Treatment of the bedding material with Bentonite or lime mainly affected the humoral immunity traits assessed herein. Lime treatments slightly increased the antibody titres for Influenza at the first challenge, but did not affect them on the second challenge. In contrast, no treatments increased total Ig titres (due to an increase in IgM) at day 38. The comparison of the nine groups (bedding type × amendment) indicated small differences in particular blood parameters and the humoral immunity traits. Conclusion: Although, no deleterious effects were found on broilers, the results suggested that different litter materials with distinct amendments may affect the final quality of carcasses.
 

Bilgili SF, Alley MA, Hess JB and Nagaraj M, 2006. Influence of age and sex on footpad quality and yield in broiler chickens reared on low and high density diets. Journal of Appllied Poultry Research 15: 433-441
Bjedov S, Žikić D, Perić L, ĐukićStojčić M and Milošević N, 2013. Effect of different litter treatments on production performance of broiler chickens. Biotechnology in Animal Husbandry 29: 625-630
Choi IH, Kim JN and Kwon YM, 2008. Effects of chemical treatments on pH and bacterial population in poultry litter: a laboratory experiment. British Poultry Science 49: 497-501.
Dawkins MS and Layton R, 2012. Breeding for better welfare: genetic goals for broiler chickens and their parents. Animal Welfare-The UFAW Journal 21: 147-155.
Ebrahimi A, Santini A, Alise M, Pourhossein P, Miraalami N and Seidavi A, 2015. Effect of dried citrus sinensis peel on gastrointestinal microbiota and immune system traits of broiler chickens. Italian Journal of Animal Science 14: 712-717.
Garcês A, Afonso SMS, Chilundo A and Jairoce CTS, 2013. Evaluation of different litter materials for broiler production in a hot and humid environment: 1. Litter characteristics and quality. Journal of Appllied Poultry Research 22: 168-176.
Garcia R, Almeida PI, Caldara FR, Nääs IA, Pereira DF, Freitas LW and Graciano J, 2010. Effect of the litter material on drinking water quality in broiler production. Revista Brasileira de Ciência Avícola 12: 165-169.
Garrido MN, Skjervheim M, Oppegaard H and Sørum H, 2004. Acidified litter benefits the intestinal flora balance of broiler chickens. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 70: 5208-5213.
Grimes JL, Carter TA, Gernat AE, Godwin JL, 2007. A novel bedding material made from cotton waste, gypsum, and old newsprint for rearing turkeys. Journal of Applied Poultry Research 16: 598-604.
Huang Y, Yoo JS, Kim HJ, Wang Y, Chen YJ, Cho JH and Kim IH, 2009. Effect of bedding types and different nutrient densities on growth performance, visceral organ weight, and blood characteristics in broiler chickens. Journal of Applied Poultry Research 18: 1-7.
Ivanov IE, 2001. Treatment of broiler litter with organic acids. Research in Veterinary Science 70: 169-173.
Karamanlis X, Fortomaris P, Arsenos G, Dosis I, Papaioannou D, Batzios C and Kamarianos A, 2008. The effect of a natural zeolite (clinoptilolite) on the performance of broiler chickens and the quality of their litter. Asian-Australian Journal of Animal Science 21: 1642-1650.
Klasing KC, 2007. Nutrition and the immune system. British Poultry Science 48: 525-537.
Line JE, 2002. Campylobacter and Salmonella populations associated with chickens raised on acidified litter. Poultry Science 81: 1473-1477.
Macklin KS and Krehling JT, 2010. The use of metam-sodium to reduce bacteria in poultry litter. Journal of Applied Poultry Research 19: 274-278.
Monira KN, Islam MA, Alam MJ and Wahid MA, 2003. Effect of litter material on broiler performance and evaluation of manurial value of used litter in late autumn. Asian Australian Journal of Animal Science 16: 555-557.
Nahavandinejad M, Seidavi A, Asadpour L and Payan-Carreira R, 2014. Blood biochemical parameters of broilers fed differently thermal processed soybean meal. Revista MVZ Córdoba 19: 4301-4315.
Piotrowska A, Burlikowska K and Szymeczko R, 2011. Changes in blood chemistry in broiler chickens during the fattening period. Folia Biology of Krakow 59:183-187.
Pourhossein Z, Qotbi AAA, Seidavi AR, Laudadio V, Centoducati G and Tufarelli V, 2015. Effect of different levels of dietary sweet orange (Citrus sinensis) peel extract on humoral immune system responses in broiler chickens. Animal Science Journal 86: 105-110.
Seidavi A, Asadpour L, Dadashbeiki M and Payan-Carreira R, 2014. Effects of dietary fish oil and green tea powder supplementation on broiler chickens immunity. Acta Scientiae Veterinariae 42: 1-13.
Shabani S, Seidavi A, Asadpour L and Corazzin M, 2015. Effects of physical form of diet and intensity and duration of feed restriction on the growth performance, blood variables, microbial flora, immunity, and carcass and organ characteristics of broiler chickens. Livestock Science 180: 150-157.
Škrbić Z, Pavlovski Z, Lukić M, Petričević V and Milić D, 2012. The effect of lighting program and type of litter on production and carcass performance of two broiler genotypes. Biotechnology in Animal Husbandry 28: 807-816.
Sohirat Torfy M, Mirzadeh KH, Tabatabaei Vakili S and Chaji M. 2017. Effects of different levels of nano-selenium solution in water on performance, ileum microbial populations, tibia bone parameters, litter quality and some blood parameters of broiler chickens. Journal of Animal Science Researches 26(4): 189-211.
Swain BK and Sundaram RNS, 2000. Effect of different types of litter material for rearing broilers. British Poultry Science 41: 261-262.
Taherparvar G, Seidavi AR, Asadpour L, Payan-Carreira R, Laudadio V and Tufarelli V, 2016. Effect of litter treatment on growth performance, intestinal development, and selected cecum microbiota in broiler chickens. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia (Brazilian Journal of Animal Science) 45: 257-264.
Torok VA, Hughes RJ, Ophel-Keller K, Ali M and MacAlpine R, 2009. Influence of different litter materials on cecal microbiota colonization in broiler chickens. Poultry Science 88: 2474-2481.
Villagra A, Olivas I, Benitez V and Lainez M, 2011. Evaluation of sludge from paper recycling as bedding material for broilers. Poultry Science 90: 953-957.